Agree..as we have learnt pauno very very rarely makes early subs. I think we might have a couple more points now if he had. He has options on the bench now. Even Tmac for DD last night would have made sense..Hound wrote:Think TDB has been a bit unlucky to become Pauno’s latest scapegoat and only good for 5-10 mins at the end
He is a bit average but he’ll give you energy and a bit of pace - would have brought him on much earlier - even ht last night
I know we're doing badly but I'm not sure bringing Simmops on would helpBigtimmeh wrote:Even Tmac for DD last night would have made sense..
He's a former semi pro I have you know, we could do worse.genome wrote:I know we're doing badly but I'm not sure bringing Simmops on would helpBigtimmeh wrote:Even Tmac for DD last night would have made sense..
Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!Jagermesiter1871 wrote: Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?
What makes you say that?John Smith wrote:Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!Jagermesiter1871 wrote: Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?
And therefore someone who isn't a supporter.
Because he's a sad little pcunt.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What makes you say that?John Smith wrote:Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!Jagermesiter1871 wrote: Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?
And therefore someone who isn't a supporter.
Hold on, aren’t you all the same person?Orion1871 wrote:Because he's a sad little pcunt.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What makes you say that?John Smith wrote: Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!
And therefore someone who isn't a supporter.
leon I thought you were DD. No?leon wrote:Hold on, aren’t you all the same person?Orion1871 wrote:Because he's a sad little pcunt.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
What makes you say that?
Bit tired of saying this now but I am just one person, this is my only account. Surely you can tell by the writing style?Zip wrote:leon I thought you were DD. No?leon wrote:Hold on, aren’t you all the same person?Orion1871 wrote:
Because he's a sad little pcunt.
To answer the question, the keeper still had a bad game: was bailed out by Morrison after a terrible error, distributed badly, was uncommanding from crosses. Saved a couple of shots which were to be expected of him.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What makes you say that?John Smith wrote:Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!Jagermesiter1871 wrote: Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?
And therefore someone who isn't a supporter.
No worse or better than a game with Southwood then. 2 good stops and I had given him a a pass with a few of the flaps as the conditions were ideal for bigger GK errors than what he had done.John Smith wrote:To answer the question, the keeper still had a bad game: was bailed out by Morrison after a terrible error, distributed badly, was uncommanding from crosses. Saved a couple of shots which were to be expected of him.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What makes you say that?John Smith wrote: Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!
And therefore someone who isn't a supporter.
More errors in one game than any of Southwood's imo. But only maybe one of those as bad as Southwood's two worst mistakes. And he got away with it.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:No worse or better than a game with Southwood then. 2 good stops and I had given him a a pass with a few of the flaps as the conditions were ideal for bigger GK errors than what he had done.John Smith wrote:To answer the question, the keeper still had a bad game: was bailed out by Morrison after a terrible error, distributed badly, was uncommanding from crosses. Saved a couple of shots which were to be expected of him.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
What makes you say that?
There were much bigger issues going on in the pitch than how Hein performed.
Not having that - he done his job. First save he made was outstanding.John Smith wrote:To answer the question, the keeper still had a bad game: was bailed out by Morrison after a terrible error, distributed badly, was uncommanding from crosses. Saved a couple of shots which were to be expected of him.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What makes you say that?John Smith wrote: Aha - someone who didn't go to the game!
And therefore someone who isn't a supporter.
And for a levelled balance debate, he had a decent game, kept us in it, contributed to first clean sheet, job well done.Snowflake Royal wrote:More errors in one game than any of Southwood's imo. But only maybe one of those as bad as Southwood's two worst mistakes. And he got away with it.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:No worse or better than a game with Southwood then. 2 good stops and I had given him a a pass with a few of the flaps as the conditions were ideal for bigger GK errors than what he had done.John Smith wrote: To answer the question, the keeper still had a bad game: was bailed out by Morrison after a terrible error, distributed badly, was uncommanding from crosses. Saved a couple of shots which were to be expected of him.
There were much bigger issues going on in the pitch than how Hein performed.
Definitely worse than the vast majority of Southwood performances. But didn’t cost us.
Snowflake Royal wrote:More errors in one game than any of Southwood's imo. But only maybe one of those as bad as Southwood's two worst mistakes. And he got away with it.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:No worse or better than a game with Southwood then. 2 good stops and I had given him a a pass with a few of the flaps as the conditions were ideal for bigger GK errors than what he had done.John Smith wrote: To answer the question, the keeper still had a bad game: was bailed out by Morrison after a terrible error, distributed badly, was uncommanding from crosses. Saved a couple of shots which were to be expected of him.
There were much bigger issues going on in the pitch than how Hein performed.
Definitely worse than the vast majority of Southwood performances. But didn’t cost us.
Especially that flap for the header across him that Morro cleared off the line.Zip wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote:More errors in one game than any of Southwood's imo. But only maybe one of those as bad as Southwood's two worst mistakes. And he got away with it.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:
No worse or better than a game with Southwood then. 2 good stops and I had given him a a pass with a few of the flaps as the conditions were ideal for bigger GK errors than what he had done.
There were much bigger issues going on in the pitch than how Hein performed.
Definitely worse than the vast majority of Southwood performances. But didn’t cost us.
Agreed The difference being Southwood was punished for his errors. Hein wasn’t. Posters would be having a very different view of Hein had his mistakes led to goals.
Why would we be talking about the bit everyone agrees on?leon wrote:Lads You’re all doing the classic team board thing arguing about an irrelevant point and really not focusing on the really important points.
The outfield team were shit.Joao looks an absolute shadow of what he was. For example.
Because it’s the most worrying and potentially damaging?Snowflake Royal wrote:Why would we be talking about the bit everyone agrees on?leon wrote:Lads You’re all doing the classic team board thing arguing about an irrelevant point and really not focusing on the really important points.
The outfield team were shit.Joao looks an absolute shadow of what he was. For example.
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Bing [Bot], gazmandu, Google [Bot], Nick Shorey my Lord!, South Coast Royal, yuomi and 164 guests