Never mind, Hull next week, won’t that be fun?Hound wrote:God sounds absymal. Glad I didn’t go
You have to wonder what Ince and his coaches work on with the players in training as there seems to be no intelligence used whatsoever. You have Carroll, you kick the ball at his head all game but you don’t set up with any width to a) play off the scraps he wins or to b) put the ball into the box for him to cause real problems.Orion1871 wrote: Only woke up in the 65th minute and started to play with some pace and urgency, but it was far too late. It says something when our best cross of the game was from Liam Moore, a Centre Back.
Mbengue needs to come back into defence really, possibly alongside Moore and Holmes at the moment. Yiadom at RWB but LWB/LB is the position that concerns me the most. Not confident with either TMac or NGW there.skipper wrote:Can we have McIntyre back in defence please?
Corrected for you.Snowflake Royal wrote:Had a lovely day in London catching up with imaginary friends.
Corrected for you.skipper wrote:Can we have a defence please?
Yeah that really, it's got to be Hendrick and then one of Fornah or Casadei ideally. Play with a front 3 that can stretch the game in wider areas, Ince and Azeez it would have to be at the moment either side of Carroll.tidus_mi2 wrote:I think we do look best with a back 5 but if we're going that route then we don't need a DM, especially not an out of position defender.
Was it Dann, Sarr or Holmes who couldn’t keep up with the breakaway for the goal and also failed to make the foul Wdowczykesque?Millsy wrote:Corrected for you.Snowflake Royal wrote:Had a lovely day in London catching up with imaginary friends.
![]()
(Just kidding obviously, don't know you personally but 'know' you well enough here to know you'd take the joke. Couldn't resist. I need a laugh after that horrid performance!)
I think that was actually NGW.Snowflake Royal wrote:Was it Dann, Sarr or Holmes who couldn’t keep up with the breakaway for the goal and also failed to make the foul Wdowczykesque?Millsy wrote:Corrected for you.Snowflake Royal wrote:Had a lovely day in London catching up with imaginary friends.
![]()
(Just kidding obviously, don't know you personally but 'know' you well enough here to know you'd take the joke. Couldn't resist. I need a laugh after that horrid performance!)
I got the impression of Dann from bits and pieces I checked in for at the pub.
Goal was Sarr's fault for sure. He gave the ball away, but I think it was NGW who didn't keep up properly. Of course Sarr also technically didn't keep up but he was so awful I wouldn't even call that slow run back a serioius attempt at "keeping" up at all. Nowhere near it.Royal_jimmy wrote:It was Sarr
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 53 guests