That graph looks like they decided what they wanted to happen and then fitted the data afterwardsWinston Biscuit wrote:
That graph looks like they decided what they wanted to happen and then fitted the data afterwardsWinston Biscuit wrote:
I'd argue not for two thirds of the division, but you've successfully made your own argument circular. If 14 teams can be relegated at the start of the season, and the Championship, and League One, is full of teams who have been in the PL in the recent past, then by definition the PL, and staying in it, is no closed shop at all.Dirk Gently wrote:There's only really PL "security" for about a third of the teams there, and for all the others I'd argue that there's a perennial fear of relegation.
by From Despair To Where? » 22 Feb 2025 08:50
22 Feb 2025 08:50by Royality creeps In » 07 Mar 2025 07:06
07 Mar 2025 07:06by From Despair To Where? » 10 Mar 2025 15:51
10 Mar 2025 15:51Utd have about 12 senior players available. Yesterday we had to sub an injured 19yo for a 17yoWinston Biscuit wrote:very much agree. Got very bored this season of PL fans banging on about their clubs 'injury crisis'.
Looking at the line up yesterday, I reckon Man Utd had 6 or 7 players (maybe more) starting who would be first XI if everyone was fit, then Hoijland came on from the bench too.BRO_BOT wrote:Utd have about 12 senior players available. Yesterday we had to sub an injured 19yo for a 17yoWinston Biscuit wrote:very much agree. Got very bored this season of PL fans banging on about their clubs 'injury crisis'.

Some of those would deffo get minutes if the whole squad was fitBRO_BOT wrote:Casemiro, Erikson, Dalot, Lindelof, one of Zirkzee/Garnacho, and one of Mazraoui/Yoro
would be out
Casemiro, Erikson, Lindelof are out of favour (and out of contract at the end of the season, bye!)Winston Biscuit wrote:Some of those would deffo get minutes if the whole squad was fitBRO_BOT wrote:Casemiro, Erikson, Dalot, Lindelof, one of Zirkzee/Garnacho, and one of Mazraoui/Yoro
would be out
The Glazers bought the club on debt, i.e. zero of their OWN money put in. This has cost UNITED over £1 BILLION in interest payments and barely touched the principle. The Glazers used to take £10 million a year in dividend payments as well. So you have wealthy owners exploiting fans to make more money whilst running the club into the ground, e.g OT leaking stadium, no resources for a women's team etc etc. Hundreds have lost their jobs due to the current cost-cutting. You are not allowed to purchase a club like this anymore (afaik)AthleticoSpizz wrote:….all a bit boo-hoo for the mighty reds, ………..sponsorship monies, full stadium of fans paying big bucks, global souvenir sales etc etc yet cannot raise a team?
Some geezer claiming to be MUs owner (Jimbo someone?) on Five Live tonight saying, without his intervention MU would be broke by November of this year. Same bloke saying MU will be the most profitable team in the ‘universe’ within three years.
Reduced to this^No sympathy (must admit, cannot remember the last time I saw a kid or even his dad wearing the MU shirt in or around Reading lately).No sympathies for any of the ‘top tier’ teams ‘hardships’ tbf
Sorry I thought you loved US Capitalism? Leveraged buy outs were all the rage! As is cost cutting, lack of infrastructure investment and getting rid of the little guys whilst over paying for "talent" !!BRO_BOT wrote:The Glazers bought the club on debt, i.e. zero of their OWN money put in. This has cost UNITED over £1 BILLION in interest payments and barely touched the principle. The Glazers used to take £10 million a year in dividend payments as well. So you have wealthy owners exploiting fans to make more money whilst running the club into the ground, e.g OT leaking stadium, no resources for a women's team etc etc. Hundreds have lost their jobs due to the current cost-cutting. You are not allowed to purchase a club like this anymore (afaik)AthleticoSpizz wrote:….all a bit boo-hoo for the mighty reds, ………..sponsorship monies, full stadium of fans paying big bucks, global souvenir sales etc etc yet cannot raise a team?
Some geezer claiming to be MUs owner (Jimbo someone?) on Five Live tonight saying, without his intervention MU would be broke by November of this year. Same bloke saying MU will be the most profitable team in the ‘universe’ within three years.
Reduced to this^No sympathy (must admit, cannot remember the last time I saw a kid or even his dad wearing the MU shirt in or around Reading lately).No sympathies for any of the ‘top tier’ teams ‘hardships’ tbf
Alex Ferguson operated a net gain in player sales/purchases for the period when the Glazers took over in 2005 to when he retired in 2013
They appointed the people to run the club, Woodward, etc, who have torched money with some terrible player purchases. I'm not sure I buy the idea that they alone were responsible for increasing revenue. Other clubs have also made increased revenue, a rising tide, etc
Would just like to see a sale and the debt cleared. Any revenue Utd makes going back into the club rather than interest and the Glazers' back pocket.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 111 guests