by Behindu »
14 Jul 2007 15:02
14 Jul 2007 15:02
working class hero wrote:Behindu wrote:working class hero wrote:I just pointed out that we had actually lost out over a player for financial reasons. Sidwell was quite clear that he would stay if his demands were met.[/b]
I don;t recall Sidwell ever saying he would stay, and as we offered him what he asked for then it seems likely that he was always planning on moving.
He said what he wanted at the START of last season. We offered him those terms at the END of the season ]
That's two very different scenarios... he may have mentioned a figure he was looking for but that's not the same as him staying. I think it's obvious that he was never going to stay. I suspect his agent threw in a figure which he was pretty sure we wouldn;t pay just to keep things ticking over but the plan was always to move on in footballing and financial terms.
working class hero wrote:[I applaud the club for their stance but wish Sidwell all the best. I do wish the RTGs would stop trying to crawl up the clubs collective arse though and could see the reality..... Hammond says we can compete with the top clubs - but we cannot, either in terms of fees or wages. So what? RFC is the club we support and many of us supported them in the lower leagues [and may do so again].
I can;t make that all out !
Hammond has never pretended we could compete with the top clubs on fees or wages.
We have competed with the top clubs on the pitch.
I can;t recall anyone saying we can be the next Man Utd - you seem to be suggesting that for some reason our relegation is inevitable. Based on last season we can compete without going down the route of financial suicide that so many others are following. I think we will find a level below what we acheived last season and we may well flirt with relegation. What reality are you trying to get people to accept ?