We watched over several times - looked like the No.7 in the middle touched it, making Suarez off-side.paultheroyal wrote:Red card was correct decision. End of he day he is three yards from the centre of goal, keeper to beat and he is brought down. No further discussion needed regardless of where ball is heading. Although he was caught the attacker waited for touch then dived. Interesting point no-one has mentioned but when ball played through he is onside but did that other attacker touch it on way through or did he step over it, because if touch was made he would of been clearly off side.
Not to mention the ridiculously dramatic dive by Suarez. Really wish there was a way for the ref to award a pen (if that is the correct decision) yet also book the player for exaggerating the incident.Row Z Royal wrote:We watched over several times - looked like the No.7 in the middle touched it, making Suarez off-side.
Naturally, not spotted by the commentary team.
Well if you foul a player who is 1 on 1 in the area, a pen is advantage attacking team. They have more chance from the spot (say 85%) than a 1 on 1 (less then 50%). So from that sense, why would you intentionally foul someone?cmonurz wrote:So if they brought in this rule, and you were a defender, about to lose an attacker through on goal, why would you not foul him?Tony Le Mesmer wrote:
The rule should be changed anyway. Unless you are denying a goal, not just an opportunity, pen should suffice.
No, but they are really, aren't they?Royal Lady wrote:South Africa aren't actually out yet btw.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests