New Kit - Rate the kit POLL ADDED

[Thaumagurist*]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg (46.77 KiB) Viewed 3249 times

[barmy_army008]

I've just noticed that....they managed to get through the whole launch without mentioning it didn't they. I think sponsor names on the back of the shirt looks cheap.

[wickedwhispers]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg

additional sponsorship is allowed in the FL league my friend.

[Rawlie19]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg

BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.

[(.)Boobies(.)]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg

BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.

Waitrose is indeed on the back, Rawlie.

[Rawlie19]

Well that's just shit then. I hope they're paying more for it. Cheap chavy looking shirts have names on the arse... oh, yeah, our shirt IS cheap chavy looking.

[(.)Boobies(.)]

Well that's just shit then. I hope they're paying more for it. Cheap chavy looking shirts have names on the arse... oh, yeah, our shirt IS cheap chavy looking.

If we continue to sign players like Matt Mills, I'm sure some sponsorship on the arse of the shirt really isn't all that bad.

[chilipepper91]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg

BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.

http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/footb ... _me_to_top

[Thaumagurist*]

Well that's just shit then. I hope they're paying more for it. Cheap chavy looking shirts have names on the arse... oh, yeah, our shirt IS cheap chavy looking.

If we continue to sign players like Matt Mills, I'm sure some sponsorship on the arse of the shirt really isn't all that bad.

You must be an arse man, despite your name!

[Drew_3]

supporters shirts dont have that (we did in the 106 year)so i guessed it was just because he was holding the shirt back to front because of wanting to show the name and the number, and the club felt abliged to have waitrose on it somewhere, the shirts in pre-season have not had it on.

[Thaumagurist*]

supporters shirts dont have that (we did in the 106 year)so i guessed it was just because he was holding the shirt back to front because of wanting to show the name and the number, and the club felt abliged to have waitrose on it somewhere, the shirts in pre-season have not had it on.

Yeah, I was wondering if it was that. I guess we'll have to wait and see tomorrow!

[Platypuss]

Is it really worse than copy >>> print >>> scan >>> fax, though?

[Rev Algenon Stickleback H]

Is it really worse than copy >>> print >>> scan >>> fax, though?

copy >>> print >>> scan >>> fax >>> WAITROSE?

[Rawlie19]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg

BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.

Waitrose is indeed on the back, Rawlie.

I think I missed it yesterday... Was it printed in blue, on the blue hoop at the bottom?

[SLAMMED]

Is this a joke? I didn't know we were having the sponsors' name on player's arses.

Mills.jpg

BS. Show me the original image without the red arrow.

Waitrose is indeed on the back, Rawlie.

I thought it was bullshit.

It was put there to advertise Waitrose for the photo shoot.

[(.)Boobies(.)]

Did anyone have their shirt untucked? Perhaps it's unviewable without being untucked? The few photos I saw recently all had it at the bottom. My assumption hopefully wrong in any case. I also disliked the home kit even more for seeing them play in it on Saturday.

[rabidbee]

The names and numbers are illegible from the back of the stand. I spent half of the game thinking we had a number 22 on the pitch, then I assumed number 27 was Henry because I couldn't read Davies' name.

[Rawlie19]

Some had shirts untucked, and no logo (thankfully). I went into the shop with my voucher ready to ponder buying it... At £25 it was tempting... until I actually saw and touched the shirt. The worst produced shirt I've ever seen. Even the first Premier League shirt with that dodgy bib was produced better than this. It looks so cheap! Nope, I've saved my money. I'll buy one IF we get promoted (as a memento of that event) and IF they reduce them to £10, otherwise they can forget it. If anyone would like to buy my £10 off voucher for a fiver they're welcome to it.

[URZZ]

I ordered the shirt friday, came today, First putting it on I noticed it already had a hole in it near the stiching on the collar!

Bloody crap

[Thaumagurist*]

Did anyone have their shirt untucked? Perhaps it's unviewable without being untucked? The few photos I saw recently all had it at the bottom. My assumption hopefully wrong in any case. I also disliked the home kit even more for seeing them play in it on Saturday.

Looks like it indeed was for just the photo shoot. Here the players are with the kit untucked:

RFC shirts.jpg (112.29 KiB) Viewed 2808 times

Note the sponsor isn't on the back of the shirt. Good job.