by Royal Rother »
22 Jun 2011 15:22
22 Jun 2011 15:22
Well, the die hards I know personally have no problem with the appointment.
Peter Simpson was for many years extremely popular, having saved the club 15 years ago (or however long ago it was) and I suspect the older supporters who came to respect him hugely over the years have found it extremely difficult to accept that latterly his time in charge was one of incompetence and mismanagement to a level that almost beggars belief. Maybe they'd rather paint Scott as the metaphorical villain whereas in fact, it appears that it was actually Simpson.
Yes, his money kept the ship afloat for many years and he's certainly not a "bad man" but his time had come and gone. Maybe Scott gave Simpson the runaround, maybe he bullied him to get his own way (I really don't know) but my impression is, and certainly has been underlined in no uncertain terms by Stott, that Scott was entirely blameless for the demise of W&EFC.
And AP, "utterly disastrous appointment...."
The new club is looking to the future, and have many initiatives to get new people involved. They won't result in substantially higher gates early on but they will have a slow but steady impact, of that I am confident. Unfortunately if a handful of the old guard decide to upsticks and leave because they don't like the manager then I suspect Stott and Scott will be "happy" to live with that.
Onwards and upwards eh?