HoneyRoastHoax wrote:Don't be silly, football is constantly under media scrutiny, if you want to launder cash there would be much easier ways of doing it.Royalwaster wrote:Money laundering. Simples.
Na, football's a complicated black hole of wages, agent fees, off shore accounts etc etc. One of the better places i can think of to 'loose' a couple of million here or there especially if you have oh...say a giant music festival in the middle of summer completely out of the blue.HoneyRoastHoax wrote:Don't be silly, football is constantly under media scrutiny, if you want to launder cash there would be much easier ways of doing it.Royalwaster wrote:Money laundering. Simples.
It's not like a Premier League Manager was recently up for Tax Evasion FFS. This stuff simply doesn't happen under the sort of media scrutiny football has to put up with.Royal Ginger wrote:Na, football's a complicated black hole of wages, agent fees, off shore accounts etc etc. One of the better places i can think of to 'loose' a couple of million here or there especially if you have oh...say a giant music festival in the middle of summer completely out of the blue.HoneyRoastHoax wrote:Don't be silly, football is constantly under media scrutiny, if you want to launder cash there would be much easier ways of doing it.Royalwaster wrote:Money laundering. Simples.
Bandini wrote:Yep, that certainly stopped Abramovich.HoneyRoastHoax wrote:Don't be silly, football is constantly under media scrutiny, if you want to launder cash there would be much easier ways of doing it.Royalwaster wrote:Money laundering. Simples.
And of course they wouldn't fib would they ?HoneyRoastHoax wrote:Jonny Fordham @JonnyFordham 49s
Update of #readingfc takeover - spoken to people close to the deal and they say there is no need to panic despite latest delays
Seem to remember similar assurances being made late last year about the disappearance of Anton.HoneyRoastHoax wrote:Jonny Fordham @JonnyFordham 49s
Update of #readingfc takeover - spoken to people close to the deal and they say there is no need to panic despite latest delays
Hi fortune was accumul8d by bribery, corruption and quasi-st8 legitim8d thefts and has been maintained in the same way. The purpose of buying Chelsea was (1) to move a large amount of money out of Russia (and, to a lesser extent, Switzerland) into a cash business and a series of assets which could be sold in the future to show a legitimate source of his wealth and (2) to have sufficient western profile to avoid being the next Khordokovsky.multisync1830 wrote:
He had no need to 'launder' money as he had plenty in the bank for all to see. Those who launder money hide what they have. His as said was about profile and tax schemes (which isn't the same as laundering). How he got his fortune is more open to question but he has never been convicted of anything so you should take care of accusations thrown around without actual evidence.
I beg to differ. Dodgy dealings happen all of the time in football. Look at how the world cup ended up in Qatar. It's just about how well you do it and how well you get away with it.Ian Royal wrote:It's not like a Premier League Manager was recently up for Tax Evasion FFS. This stuff simply doesn't happen under the sort of media scrutiny football has to put up with.Royal Ginger wrote:Na, football's a complicated black hole of wages, agent fees, off shore accounts etc etc. One of the better places i can think of to 'loose' a couple of million here or there especially if you have oh...say a giant music festival in the middle of summer completely out of the blue.HoneyRoastHoax wrote:
Don't be silly, football is constantly under media scrutiny, if you want to launder cash there would be much easier ways of doing it.
Rrrrrimsky Korsakov!Bandini wrote:Hi fortune was accumul8d by bribery, corruption and quasi-st8 legitim8d thefts and has been maintained in the same way. The purpose of buying Chelsea was (1) to move a large amount of money out of Russia (and, to a lesser extent, Switzerland) into a cash business and a series of assets which could be sold in the future to show a legitimate source of his wealth and (2) to have sufficient western profile to avoid being the next Khordokovsky.multisync1830 wrote:
He had no need to 'launder' money as he had plenty in the bank for all to see. Those who launder money hide what they have. His as said was about profile and tax schemes (which isn't the same as laundering). How he got his fortune is more open to question but he has never been convicted of anything so you should take care of accusations thrown around without actual evidence.

Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 222 guests