Yeah lol, god forbid we turn out to have a long term strategy implemented like the one Rodgers has got going theremultisync1830 wrote:
You sound like Looserpool. "Next year Rodney"
by winchester_royal » 01 Aug 2014 14:17
01 Aug 2014 14:17Yeah lol, god forbid we turn out to have a long term strategy implemented like the one Rodgers has got going theremultisync1830 wrote:
You sound like Looserpool. "Next year Rodney"
by P!ssed Off » 01 Aug 2014 14:20
01 Aug 2014 14:20by YateleyRoyal » 01 Aug 2014 14:31
01 Aug 2014 14:31BOOM!Uke wrote:If this goes wrong the club will sink without trace
It'll be like the Thai-tanic
Nothing wrong with Billy Sharp. He's just as proven as Le Fondre at this level. OK he might not be the next level but at least he'd give us something up front.Terminal Boardom wrote:At this rate, Billy Sharp would be a good signing.BR2 wrote:Jolly good-all you guys have the answers but really know f*** all however you all post with great authority.
Nameless,
Do you really believe that Nigel is happy to go with unproven youngsters?
His record at Southampton shows that if there is money to spend he will readily have it spent.
I only hope that we don't end up with Billy Sharp.
The Rouge wrote:New Ownership Deal Thaid UpUke wrote:Now the threads are merged, how about a new title without a typo?
Source is Tim DellorJC wrote:What is your source for this other than "I hear" ?Sutekh wrote:I also hear that the payment is to be completed via an installment plan so this suggests that the "consortium" do not have the monies available up front at this point in time, certainly that would probably be why the club are terming it as a partnership. Whether this plan is for several installments over several years or a few installments over 6/12 months isn't known (yet).
So, unless this is the only way payment could be arranged given the political situation in Thailand, we may well be going from one limited owner to another.
Therefore i'm not going to expect much even if the FL do approve it.
The ball is with you Samrit and Srivikorn, amaze us
by multisync1830 » 01 Aug 2014 14:47
01 Aug 2014 14:47What has he got going there, nothing IMHO. They will be back to where they belong next season, without Suarez they are very average.A smokescreen no more.winchester_royal wrote:Yeah lol, god forbid we turn out to have a long term strategy implemented like the one Rodgers has got going theremultisync1830 wrote:
You sound like Looserpool. "Next year Rodney"
by windermere_royal » 01 Aug 2014 15:09
01 Aug 2014 15:09Must be true thenSutekh wrote:Source is Tim DellorJC wrote:What is your source for this other than "I hear" ?Sutekh wrote:I also hear that the payment is to be completed via an installment plan so this suggests that the "consortium" do not have the monies available up front at this point in time, certainly that would probably be why the club are terming it as a partnership. Whether this plan is for several installments over several years or a few installments over 6/12 months isn't known (yet).
So, unless this is the only way payment could be arranged given the political situation in Thailand, we may well be going from one limited owner to another.
Therefore i'm not going to expect much even if the FL do approve it.
The ball is with you Samrit and Srivikorn, amaze us, BBC Radio Berkshire at about 09:10 this morning.
by winchester_royal » 01 Aug 2014 15:13
01 Aug 2014 15:13I couldn't disagree more. To me, Liverpool look like the one top 6 club that have a coherent strategy going.multisync1830 wrote:What has he got going there, nothing IMHO. They will be back to where they belong next season, without Suarez they are very average.A smokescreen no more.winchester_royal wrote:Yeah lol, god forbid we turn out to have a long term strategy implemented like the one Rodgers has got going theremultisync1830 wrote:
You sound like Looserpool. "Next year Rodney"
I agree RFC cannot afford to throw caution to the wind this year or even with these new owners but aiming for 'average' long term isn't making my heart race.
by Terminal Boardom » 01 Aug 2014 16:24
01 Aug 2014 16:24Which is precisely why Chelsea have won 2 Premier Leagues and the Champions League. Hang on, I might have misread that.winchester_royal wrote:I'm not just talking about this season though. Football is a long term sport that requires long term thinking. I think we have more than enough quality in this current squad to stay up. When players are back fit we'll have arguably the best set of midfielders in the league, a very decent defence, and a class striker. Yes we'll probably lack the depth required to challenge seriously, but I think we've got a better chance of taking the division by storm with a small tight nit group of players that work hard for each other (ala 05/06) rather than signing a few average journeymen to fill up the squad. And then over the next couple of seasons we can really kick on with some blooded youngsters and a well thought out recruitment strategy. And I will be more than happy with that.BR2 wrote:Are you sure you don't work for the club in the PR dept.?winchester_royal wrote:Don't quite what people are hoping for out of this tbh. Maybe some still cling to the slightly delusional idea that there's a multi-billionaire out there waiting to make us the new Man City. Or maybe some believe that there's a philanthropic football loving rich guy willing to clear our debts and pump money in without expecting anything in return.
The club is on the right path in a lot of ways. The academy is going from strength to strength. We have a number of talented young players starting out on their careers with us. We have a number of excellent coaches across the various squads. We just need a bit of financial stability after the excesses of TSI, a secure hand on the rudder, nothing too flashy or destabilising. Let that infrastructure that has been built from the ground up over the last 20 years do the talking. I imagine that is what Sir John was looking for from the new owners. And if the Thais happen to make some money off a bit of land redevelopment then fair play to them.
A lot is being made of our young players and it requires a massive leap of faith to believe that more than a couple of these will be good enough to play in the Championship this season.
The club has had a bit of a clearout and I would expect at the very least 3 or 4 new signings for this season-it's what football clubs do,especially those with parachute payments to enjoy and use.
Bitch and whine as much as you want, that's your prerogative I guess, but there are plenty of clubs out there who would very much like to be in our position right now. I genuinely believe that.
by Trebor_Blue » 01 Aug 2014 17:15
01 Aug 2014 17:15Instalments = suitcases stuffed with cash?Sutekh wrote:I also hear that the payment is to be completed via an installment plan so this suggests that the "consortium" do not have the monies available up front at this point in time, certainly that would probably be why the club are terming it as a partnership. Whether this plan is for several installments over several years or a few installments over 6/12 months isn't known (yet).
So, unless this is the only way payment could be arranged given the political situation in Thailand, we may well be going from one limited owner to another.
Therefore i'm not going to expect much even if the FL do approve it.
The ball is with you Samrit and Srivikorn, amaze us
by Ian Royal » 01 Aug 2014 17:17
01 Aug 2014 17:17I'm not sure I really buy into him trying particularly hard to play youngsters.tidus_mi2 wrote:I'd say last time Brendan tried to play youngsters and change the playing style, to his credit, Adkins at least knows when to adapt to the players strengths so may have more success at integrating youngsters.
by Ian Royal » 01 Aug 2014 17:22
01 Aug 2014 17:22RacistUke wrote:Instalments = suitcases stuffed with cash?Sutekh wrote:I also hear that the payment is to be completed via an installment plan so this suggests that the "consortium" do not have the monies available up front at this point in time, certainly that would probably be why the club are terming it as a partnership. Whether this plan is for several installments over several years or a few installments over 6/12 months isn't known (yet).
So, unless this is the only way payment could be arranged given the political situation in Thailand, we may well be going from one limited owner to another.
Therefore i'm not going to expect much even if the FL do approve it.
The ball is with you Samrit and Srivikorn, amaze us
They may not be the rich Thaicoons we thought they were?
Don't create racism when there is none line some racist version of Dr Sam Becket jumping from thread to thread hoping that the last thread will the one that sends them home.trueroyal1871 wrote:RacistUke wrote:They may not be the rich Thaicoons we thought they were?
by Victor Meldrew » 01 Aug 2014 17:35
01 Aug 2014 17:35I'll ask again winch-do you work in the PR dept or are you just young, massively optimistic and just a bit gullible rather than like some of us old gits who are....old and cynical?winchester_royal wrote:I'm not just talking about this season though. Football is a long term sport that requires long term thinking. I think we have more than enough quality in this current squad to stay up. When players are back fit we'll have arguably the best set of midfielders in the league, a very decent defence, and a class striker. Yes we'll probably lack the depth required to challenge seriously, but I think we've got a better chance of taking the division by storm with a small tight nit group of players that work hard for each other (ala 05/06) rather than signing a few average journeymen to fill up the squad. And then over the next couple of seasons we can really kick on with some blooded youngsters and a well thought out recruitment strategy. And I will be more than happy with that.BR2 wrote:Are you sure you don't work for the club in the PR dept.?winchester_royal wrote:Don't quite what people are hoping for out of this tbh. Maybe some still cling to the slightly delusional idea that there's a multi-billionaire out there waiting to make us the new Man City. Or maybe some believe that there's a philanthropic football loving rich guy willing to clear our debts and pump money in without expecting anything in return.
The club is on the right path in a lot of ways. The academy is going from strength to strength. We have a number of talented young players starting out on their careers with us. We have a number of excellent coaches across the various squads. We just need a bit of financial stability after the excesses of TSI, a secure hand on the rudder, nothing too flashy or destabilising. Let that infrastructure that has been built from the ground up over the last 20 years do the talking. I imagine that is what Sir John was looking for from the new owners. And if the Thais happen to make some money off a bit of land redevelopment then fair play to them.
A lot is being made of our young players and it requires a massive leap of faith to believe that more than a couple of these will be good enough to play in the Championship this season.
The club has had a bit of a clearout and I would expect at the very least 3 or 4 new signings for this season-it's what football clubs do,especially those with parachute payments to enjoy and use.
Bitch and whine as much as you want, that's your prerogative I guess, but there are plenty of clubs out there who would very much like to be in our position right now. I genuinely believe that.
The pun was too En Thai Singtrueroyal1871 wrote:RacistUke wrote:They may not be the rich Thaicoons we thought they were?
Lacoste wrote:None of you have a clue so chill and wait to see who is involved/costed etc when all confirmed.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Starry Blue Hooped Wonder and 125 guests