I think it explains why the place holds 76000 without actually looking that big. It's as if the rebuilt the ground on the assumption that every fan has the build of Charles Hawtrey.Westwood52 wrote: I thought the seating was extremely tight-the bloke next to me could do with losing a few pounds, but he wasn't obese-yet he straddled my seat quite a bit-the gaps between the rows was tight as well.
I asked my Leicester supporting mate what he thought of Moore when we signed him. He said he looks class in the championship but clueless in the prem hence why they sold him.peterroyal76 wrote:Was he 'found out' or did he just have a bad game?Lower West wrote:Watching the goals back, all four..........Westwood52 wrote: Moore 5:Got found out
My early recollections of Doyle was that he far from the finished product i.e. couldn't hit a barn door. Long was simply a raw talent. etc etc etc.Westwood52 wrote: Have the days when we acquired Doyle/Kitson/Long/Sidwell/Sonko(all Prem quality) in a narrow transfer window gone ?
How have over half of the summer signings proved to be a waste when we're sat in the play offs and most of them regularly contribute?Westwood wrote:To end ; has Director of football done a reasonable job, when over half of the summers acquisitions have proved to be a waste-is this level of return what is acceptable ? Wouldn't it have been better for instance to use both Mendes and Meighte's salary on one really good player ? Or perhaps that level of player couldn't be attracted
He needs a manager/coach who can change that and we have just the man!Jagermesiter1871 wrote:I asked my Leicester supporting mate what he thought of Moore when we signed him. He said he looks class in the championship but clueless in the prem hence why they sold him.peterroyal76 wrote:Was he 'found out' or did he just have a bad game?Lower West wrote:
Watching the goals back, all four..........
I don't think there's a problem with our signings for the main part, but Weiser, Gravenberch and Mendes have barely featured at all. That's three signings. Meite, Jaakola and Harriott show promise but haven'y actually delivered or played a whole lot (I have no problem with that (the first three seem odd signings, especially Mendes). Beerens, JVDB and Blackett get quite mixed reviews, although playing regularly. That leaves Swift and Moore as the clear successes - outnumbered by the so far clear failures in Weiser, Gravenberch and Mendes... if you want to take an overly pessimistic view.Sutekh wrote:How have over half of the summer signings proved to be a waste when we're sat in the play offs and most of them regularly contribute?Westwood wrote:To end ; has Director of football done a reasonable job, when over half of the summers acquisitions have proved to be a waste-is this level of return what is acceptable ? Wouldn't it have been better for instance to use both Mendes and Meighte's salary on one really good player ? Or perhaps that level of player couldn't be attracted
Of those brought in only Weiser could be argued to be a waste so far. Mendes is probably the next weakest link but has been injured for part of his time and has never had a real opportunity.
Don't think any of the other acquisitions (Berg, Swift, Jaakkola, Moore, Blackett, Meite, Harriott, Beerens) could be argued to be a waste.
Possibly we could have saved a little bit of money by not bothering with Mendes and/or Meite but not sure who you think we could have got with the money that would have saved.
I think the management did well in the summer esp. considering there was little money available, Stam was a total unknown in management terms and Reading was possibly about as attractive to proven quality players as a trip to the dentist after the last couple of miserable seasons.
bobby1413?Westwood52 wrote: the bloke next to me could do with losing a few pounds
+1Sutekh wrote:How have over half of the summer signings proved to be a waste when we're sat in the play offs and most of them regularly contribute?Westwood wrote:To end ; has Director of football done a reasonable job, when over half of the summers acquisitions have proved to be a waste-is this level of return what is acceptable ? Wouldn't it have been better for instance to use both Mendes and Meighte's salary on one really good player ? Or perhaps that level of player couldn't be attracted
Of those brought in only Weiser could be argued to be a waste so far. Mendes is probably the next weakest link but has been injured for part of his time and has never had a real opportunity.
Don't think any of the other acquisitions (Berg, Swift, Jaakkola, Moore, Blackett, Meite, Harriott, Beerens) could be argued to be a waste.
Possibly we could have saved a little bit of money by not bothering with Mendes and/or Meite but not sure who you think we could have got with the money that would have saved.
I think the management did well in the summer esp. considering there was little money available, Stam was a total unknown in management terms and Reading was possibly about as attractive to proven quality players as a trip to the dentist after the last couple of miserable seasons.
sputnik wrote:bobby1413?Westwood52 wrote: the bloke next to me could do with losing a few pounds
I think that's a pretty harsh analysis given he made his debut in the Prem at 21. Clearly he was never going to be the finished article at that point and the pressure for a young player in a CB pairing in the Prem must be pretty intense, especially in a Leicester team which was struggling. He played the first 10 games, was dropped until Morgan got sent off at which point he came back in, but only for one game while Morgan served his ban. Fell out of favour and didn't appear again. I'm willing to suggest he has come a long way since then and the experience will stand him in good stead if he (and we) get there again.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:I asked my Leicester supporting mate what he thought of Moore when we signed him. He said he looks class in the championship but clueless in the prem hence why they sold him.peterroyal76 wrote:Was he 'found out' or did he just have a bad game?Lower West wrote:
Watching the goals back, all four..........
Another +1West Stand Man wrote:+1Sutekh wrote:How have over half of the summer signings proved to be a waste when we're sat in the play offs and most of them regularly contribute?Westwood wrote:To end ; has Director of football done a reasonable job, when over half of the summers acquisitions have proved to be a waste-is this level of return what is acceptable ? Wouldn't it have been better for instance to use both Mendes and Meighte's salary on one really good player ? Or perhaps that level of player couldn't be attracted
Of those brought in only Weiser could be argued to be a waste so far. Mendes is probably the next weakest link but has been injured for part of his time and has never had a real opportunity.
Don't think any of the other acquisitions (Berg, Swift, Jaakkola, Moore, Blackett, Meite, Harriott, Beerens) could be argued to be a waste.
Possibly we could have saved a little bit of money by not bothering with Mendes and/or Meite but not sure who you think we could have got with the money that would have saved.
I think the management did well in the summer esp. considering there was little money available, Stam was a total unknown in management terms and Reading was possibly about as attractive to proven quality players as a trip to the dentist after the last couple of miserable seasons.
Getting beaten away at OT >>> Losing at home to a relegation threatened championship sidemarlowuk wrote:I also hope that this comprehensive defeat does not damage our confidence in the league now. It shouldn't and let's see that confirmed with 3 points on Thursday!!
Reminds me of the away end at Fratton Park, I went to sit in my seat and because of my height/long legs I couldn't actually get my arse onto the seat. I ended up standing the whole game at the back next to a steward.Westwood52 wrote:I had to stand up for the whole ninety minutes
Tad harsh. Utterly abysmal for the first 20 minutes (and unlike some, I would include Kelly, Evans et al in that - defence were headless chickens but the midfield might as well not have been on the pitch at all). And alternating between poor, mediocre and "promising but toothless" for the rest of the game.No Fixed Abode wrote:Without getting too technical on Reading's performance. They were abysmal.