Was Yiadom literally back for 1 game from a bad injury and now has another bad one? FFS.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Yiadom and Puscas out until well in to the new year; Arauna back soon after Swift
Was Yiadom literally back for 1 game from a bad injury and now has another bad one? FFS.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Yiadom and Puscas out until well in to the new year; Arauna back soon after Swift
yepJagermesiter1871 wrote:Was Yiadom literally back for 1 game from a bad injury and now has another bad one? FFS.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Yiadom and Puscas out until well in to the new year; Arauna back soon after Swift
Yeah, didn't look bad to me.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Joao could have been just cramp, he's played a lot of minutes. I reckon he'll be rested tomorrow even if fit, as will a couple of others with next week's games V Norwich and Brentford
Update - he's just posted on twitter to Yaks "counting the days until your back bro" sounds like he may be ok?
Think Araruna might be our best RB anyway.Hound wrote:yepJagermesiter1871 wrote:Was Yiadom literally back for 1 game from a bad injury and now has another bad one? FFS.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Yiadom and Puscas out until well in to the new year; Arauna back soon after Swift
I think you're mad. My ranking would be Yiadom>Holmes>Araruna>/=Esteves.Snowflake Royal wrote:Think Araruna might be our best RB anyway.Hound wrote:yepJagermesiter1871 wrote:
Was Yiadom literally back for 1 game from a bad injury and now has another bad one? FFS.
he might be - genuinely not got enough evidence to say. He played well in a couple and looked a bit ropey in others if I rememberSnowflake Royal wrote:Think Araruna might be our best RB anyway.Hound wrote:yepJagermesiter1871 wrote:
Was Yiadom literally back for 1 game from a bad injury and now has another bad one? FFS.
Don't remember him looking ropey.Hound wrote:he might be - genuinely not got enough evidence to say. He played well in a couple and looked a bit ropey in others if I rememberSnowflake Royal wrote:Think Araruna might be our best RB anyway.Hound wrote:
yep
wasn't there one game where an early goal or two came down his side with him out of position? may have been a friendly or something, genuinely can't remember. Think he made up for it with a couple of decent crosses and maybe an assist laterSnowflake Royal wrote:Don't remember him looking ropey.Hound wrote:he might be - genuinely not got enough evidence to say. He played well in a couple and looked a bit ropey in others if I rememberSnowflake Royal wrote: Think Araruna might be our best RB anyway.
It might be more accurate to say he's the most traditional of our RBs. Fairly conservative, mostly stays wide, crosses well
Cup game against ColchesterHound wrote:wasn't there one game where an early goal or two came down his side with him out of position? may have been a friendly or something, genuinely can't remember. Think he made up for it with a couple of decent crosses and maybe an assist laterSnowflake Royal wrote:Don't remember him looking ropey.Hound wrote:
he might be - genuinely not got enough evidence to say. He played well in a couple and looked a bit ropey in others if I remember
It might be more accurate to say he's the most traditional of our RBs. Fairly conservative, mostly stays wide, crosses well
might even have been last season for all i know tbh
thanks, yep that was the oneURZZZZ wrote:Cup game against ColchesterHound wrote:wasn't there one game where an early goal or two came down his side with him out of position? may have been a friendly or something, genuinely can't remember. Think he made up for it with a couple of decent crosses and maybe an assist laterSnowflake Royal wrote: Don't remember him looking ropey.
It might be more accurate to say he's the most traditional of our RBs. Fairly conservative, mostly stays wide, crosses well
might even have been last season for all i know tbh
Hard to tell yet with him, only played 4/5 times there. Think Yiadom is a fairly good option, albeit has limitations too which IMO stops him from being a top end Champ player
Nope.All quiet.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Have we had any sort of confirmation on whether he is definitely out?Zip wrote:Joao spent the last five minutes barely walking. Looked like his hamstring was playing up.mumbo-jumbo wrote:So what is supposed to have happened to Joao? Must have missed that
Understand Meite had a clash with keeper (? head ? knee) but why is everyone talking about them both being out? Will be tough if that's the case
That is good news and like you, I would expect him to be on the bench with a view ahead to the next few games.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Joao has travelled apparently, reckon will be on the bench at best but if true that's still excellent news for next week's games.
Not really.South Coast Royal wrote:He is obviously generally match fit and I have always thought that sitting around on the bench with a slight injury can make things worse.
Hopefully he starts because just reading in today's paper that Meite and Joao are injury doubts and that Baldock and Aluko might well play has given me a dose of Saturday morning depression.
This squad really is thin isn't it?
But they are top which implies that despite those injuries they have decent players to come in.From Despair To Where? wrote:I think pretty much every club would struggle with their first 3 strikers out. Norwich gave been dealing with precisely that issue in the past couple of weeks.s
.South Coast Royal wrote:But they are top which implies that despite those injuries they have decent players to come in.From Despair To Where? wrote:I think pretty much every club would struggle with their first 3 strikers out. Norwich gave been dealing with precisely that issue in the past couple of weeks.s
My observation was that OUR squad is a bit thin and am not arguing with Ian about whether it has been in the past-that is a different issue.
My view is that if the owners do want promotion we really do need 2 or 3 more in the window.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], bluerinse, Google Adsense [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 69 guests