Isn’t that basically the same as it always has been?katweslowski wrote:Can anyone tell me what the actual feck a contract in football means? Why are players contracted until 2026 and then can just bloody leave? I'm guessing it's clauses, like if another club pays a lot of money as a penalty/compensation, or if the club failed in some way such as relegated.
It is annoying though to see Knibbs and others listed as being contracted and then hear people talking about them leaving anyway.
It gives the player and the club a certain level of protection.katweslowski wrote:Can anyone tell me what the actual feck a contract in football means? Why are players contracted until 2026 and then can just bloody leave? I'm guessing it's clauses, like if another club pays a lot of money as a penalty/compensation, or if the club failed in some way such as relegated.
It is annoying though to see Knibbs and others listed as being contracted and then hear people talking about them leaving anyway.
Button makes a lot more sense as a signing having seen CBC play more first team games.Sutekh wrote:Hutch was generally a decent shout but fell out with the management as Selles couldn’t handle conflicting opinions, Dean just got injured, and Selles again didn’t seem to like or want older pros (probably because of their experience and not being afraid to speak up), but started to look more like a player with Hunt managing the ship. Andy Carroll was decent and he did his part for the club by accepting a low wage, could have got more out of him if he kept his head down a bit more but I think he was a decent return for the outlay. Never really saw the point in Button!Linden Jones' Tash wrote:'If' we are allowed to strengthen, I am a little concerned at our track record when it comes to bringing in 'experienced' players to support the younger academy 'break-throughs'
I'd argue the money spent on signing on fees and wages for Hutchinson, Button, Dean, Carroll wasn't the best use of limited resources.
I understand the idea that you may need a blend of youth and experience - but given who we have (Yiadom, Wing,) I'd be happier if the investment went on different profiles.
We miss pace and power in the side IMHO.
I have confidence that Brian Carey’s influence will mean that any more “golden oldies” that are turned up going forward will be worth the punt.
Yeah, I'm not sure what the confusion is.Hound wrote:Isn’t that basically the same as it always has been?katweslowski wrote:Can anyone tell me what the actual feck a contract in football means? Why are players contracted until 2026 and then can just bloody leave? I'm guessing it's clauses, like if another club pays a lot of money as a penalty/compensation, or if the club failed in some way such as relegated.
It is annoying though to see Knibbs and others listed as being contracted and then hear people talking about them leaving anyway.
Being under contract at least means we can negotiate a fee for them, which is massive for clubs at our level
Transfer means “transfer of contract” and there is a fee payable for thattidus_mi2 wrote:It gives the player and the club a certain level of protection.katweslowski wrote:Can anyone tell me what the actual feck a contract in football means? Why are players contracted until 2026 and then can just bloody leave? I'm guessing it's clauses, like if another club pays a lot of money as a penalty/compensation, or if the club failed in some way such as relegated.
It is annoying though to see Knibbs and others listed as being contracted and then hear people talking about them leaving anyway.
The player gets an agreed wage and can't be let go early without some sort of an agreement with the club.
The club can get value out of the player when it comes to transfer fees.
TBH he isn't the wide player I'd want now. Never really took players on like he should be doing. Vickers, when given the chance to play wide right, had started looking so good on that side before being pushed wide left. Not sure I would take him back now.Stranded wrote:Standard - doesn't mean he won't be back - not that I think he will be. 7 goals and 4 assists is not a bad return, not great but OK - so be may be on a list if he becomes available again.Uke wrote:Chem has said goodbye on Insta
Wareham does all the dirty work you want a lone forward to do fantastically - if he can add regular goals to his game, he'll play at a higher level.Hound wrote:Wareham did enough for me to extend his contract. May well get better as well
Ehibhatiomhan didn’t have the best of seasons, but was still useful. He has 12 goals from about 50 starts last two years and still only 22. Again a definite contract offer imo
I meant in the starting XI, to allow better continuity and build upon chemistry. I think I would still have them start but with better options on the bench who are ultimately capable of taking their spot if necessary.Hound wrote:Wareham did enough for me to extend his contract. May well get better as well
Ehibhatiomhan didn’t have the best of seasons, but was still useful. He has 12 goals from about 50 starts last two years and still only 22. Again a definite contract offer imo
Wareham reminds me a lot of NHunt.Hound wrote:Wareham did enough for me to extend his contract. May well get better as well
Agreed - and his stats in terms of goal contributions aren't too bad.WestYorksRoyal wrote:They need to get Wareham's parents on one of the RFC pods. Seem like a great influence, and the whole family including Jayden "gets" what the club is about. Definitely want to see him stay around and be given the chance to progress here.
Think I may have confused Chem by shouting "Jesus Christ" every time he failed to beat his man or deliver a telling ball.Ascotexgunner wrote:TBH he isn't the wide player I'd want now. Never really took players on like he should be doing. Vickers, when given the chance to play wide right, had started looking so good on that side before being pushed wide left. Not sure I would take him back now.Stranded wrote:Standard - doesn't mean he won't be back - not that I think he will be. 7 goals and 4 assists is not a bad return, not great but OK - so be may be on a list if he becomes available again.Uke wrote:Chem has said goodbye on Insta
If I was gonna take one player back it would be Abbey, that's because he could play as a centre back or full back. Thought he was brilliant at CB personally.
With all 5 senior midfielders fit, I'm not sure there's clear starters for the three spaces.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Continuity is normally a good thing, but assuming not else leaves, the only positions where existing players would be a shoe in to start our opening game would be Pereira, Mbengue and the midfield 3. All other positions would be up for grabs.
Abrefa, Ehibhatiomhan and Wareham have probably done end if you want to keep it resembling this year's team more closely.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 954 guests