Someone had one of those that the half marathon.oxf*rd annoying jesus christ.It really did grind my gears.royalexile wrote:
by Royalshow » 29 Apr 2009 21:40
29 Apr 2009 21:40Someone had one of those that the half marathon.oxf*rd annoying jesus christ.It really did grind my gears.royalexile wrote:
by working class hero » 29 Apr 2009 21:41
29 Apr 2009 21:41I had one of these [but twice the size] in the 70s - made a hell of a racket!royalexile wrote:
by Rex » 29 Apr 2009 21:42
29 Apr 2009 21:42by working class hero » 29 Apr 2009 21:52
29 Apr 2009 21:52Throwing these would be more fun!royalexile wrote:My dad being a wiz with anything to do with wood made me one for a laugh a few years back.
by Pat Butchers Ring » 29 Apr 2009 22:20
29 Apr 2009 22:20by SLAMMED » 29 Apr 2009 22:44
29 Apr 2009 22:44by ellpryjon » 29 Apr 2009 23:03
29 Apr 2009 23:03royalexile wrote:

by Rex » 29 Apr 2009 23:17
29 Apr 2009 23:17by Scrappy » 30 Apr 2009 02:07
30 Apr 2009 02:07by Rex » 30 Apr 2009 02:20
30 Apr 2009 02:20
by RoyalBlue » 30 Apr 2009 08:32
30 Apr 2009 08:32Nah, tear them up into lots of little pieces and throw them up into the air as the teams come out!!Deathy wrote:Screw them up into a ball and throw em.
by West Stand Man » 30 Apr 2009 08:52
30 Apr 2009 08:52SLAMMED wrote:Mine will go straight on the floor, and will remain there until the litterpicking brigade come to scavenge leftovers.
by West Stand Man » 30 Apr 2009 08:53
30 Apr 2009 08:53by Deathy » 30 Apr 2009 09:17
30 Apr 2009 09:17Define worked for them?West Stand Man wrote:A couplke fo weeks ago the Brum set up issued similar things to their crown for the Wolves game. Seemed to work for them didn't it?
by Silver Fox » 30 Apr 2009 11:59
30 Apr 2009 11:59I couldn't have put it better myselfDeathy wrote:Thank fuk I'm staying at home to watch it on telly!
by Hoop Blah » 30 Apr 2009 12:57
30 Apr 2009 12:57I know you said you didn't want to enter into a drawn out justification of this but any chance you might briefly answer my main point in response to your post?Hoop Blah wrote:Firstly, my reaction to these cringe worthy initiatives has nothing to do with any cyber-image but lots to do with my enjoyment of watching the sport I love and the team I've followed for the best part of 25 years.STAR Campaigns wrote: Personally, on Sunday I'll be doing what I usually do at matches, which is applauding, moaning, singing and clapping as appropriate - not to mention abusing the linesman at regular intervals and muttering "cow's arse ... banjo" whenever SHunt has a shot. I'll also have my hands full of mobile phone as I keep track of what's happening at Selhurst Park every 30 secnds.
For a couple of reasons, I'm not going to enter into a defence, debate, discussion or otherwise of these things. Others can do that if they feel the need.
The people on HNA? were always going to loudly hate them, because the default setting of HNA? is almost always to criticise - so the reaction was entirely predictable. But - and this applies to so many things, not just "clapper banners" - the population of HNA? is relatively small compared to the overall population of Reading supporters, and so, hard as it may be to believe, the views of nobbers are not necessarily representative of the majority of Reading supporters. Those with the loudest voices don't always speak for everyone, so while certain nobbers may hate them, many other supporters may not. And I can't help but feel that for a certain number, what they say here is more to do with the cyber-image they're trying to project about themselves than what they actually think.
Secondly, you say the views expressed by those who are this kind of anti-false atmosphere generating is just a loud minority voice. Can you tell me what canvassing of the support you've done to come to this conclusion?
I'm sure a high percentage of people will wave the damn things about on Sunday, but how many of those will be doing it a) begrudgingly to try and help generate the atmosphere the club wants to do everything they can to help achieve the goal, b) to take the piss out of the whole thing, c) to hide their own embarrassment, d) because they think it's a great idea and will help create the electric atmosphere that would otherwise be lacking at the biggest game of the season.
My point is that some will think this is a great idea. Some will hate it and shy away. Some will be anti it but give it a go to save it from falling on its face and killing the natural atmosphere that might just build up through the enthusiasm of the team and fans anyway.
by madreadingfan » 30 Apr 2009 13:13
30 Apr 2009 13:13you would say that west stand manWest Stand Man wrote:A couple of weeks ago the Brum set up issued similar things to their crowd for the Wolves game. Seemed to work for them didn't it?
by Royalshow » 30 Apr 2009 13:18
30 Apr 2009 13:18by boy1985 » 30 Apr 2009 13:19
30 Apr 2009 13:19'greed. the madstad can be a cauldron of hate.West Stand Man wrote:A couple of weeks ago the Brum set up issued similar things to their crowd for the Wolves game. Seemed to work for them didn't it?

by Maguire » 30 Apr 2009 13:34
30 Apr 2009 13:34Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 76 guests