by Silver Fox » 20 May 2010 20:10
20 May 2010 20:10
by RoyalBlue » 20 May 2010 20:20
20 May 2010 20:20With respect I don't believe that is correct. Even the club stated that some sales were an economic necessity and, if they weren't, why did we reinvest so little of that received and why can we not now afford Zurab?wolsey wrote:When was the last time we were that? (Post Play-Off failure 94/95 is the only time that I can think that we sold any number of players that we may have wanted to keep - the sale of players post relegation from the Prem were a necessity driven by the players' desire as much as economic strategy, otherwise we would have sold the likes of Doyle, Bikey, Matejovsky the minute we were relegated)Royal1983 wrote:By the looks things, about time they gave something back other than the vouchers tbh. Wonder if Sir John will let McD buy anyone in or if we will be a feeder club for bigger teams again?!?!M-U-R-T-Y wrote:So this is what the FA cup run paid for...
I think the reality was that there was a need to balance the books last season and the fact that our most saleable assets were going to leave anyway meant that came about - a happy conjunction ! We didn't sell Doyle in order to balance the books, but his sale meant they balanced (if you see what I mean ). It also meant we were able to spend getting on for 3 million on new players and be prepared to spend another 1.7 or whatever it was.RoyalBlue wrote:With respect I don't believe that is correct. Even the club stated that some sales were an economic necessity and, if they weren't, why did we reinvest so little of that received and why can we not now afford Zurab?wolsey wrote:When was the last time we were that? (Post Play-Off failure 94/95 is the only time that I can think that we sold any number of players that we may have wanted to keep - the sale of players post relegation from the Prem were a necessity driven by the players' desire as much as economic strategy, otherwise we would have sold the likes of Doyle, Bikey, Matejovsky the minute we were relegated)Royal1983 wrote:
By the looks things, about time they gave something back other than the vouchers tbh. Wonder if Sir John will let McD buy anyone in or if we will be a feeder club for bigger teams again?!?!
The u12 (it's u16 isn't it ?) is very good value, i can;t imagin emany u16's who are more than casual fans not getting a ST when it is about £3.75 a game.PEARCEY wrote:I think the ST's represent good value especially for the under 12's. In a couple of seasons time I may well be in...
Sun Tzu wrote:The u12 (it's u16 isn't it ?) is very good value, i can;t imagin emany u16's who are more than casual fans not getting a ST when it is about £3.75 a game.PEARCEY wrote:I think the ST's represent good value especially for the under 12's. In a couple of seasons time I may well be in...
I'm certainly getting one and hoping I can get away with it for the 17th successive season....
I think they trimmed down the categories when we got relegatedPEARCEY wrote:Sun Tzu wrote:The u12 (it's u16 isn't it ?) is very good value, i can;t imagin emany u16's who are more than casual fans not getting a ST when it is about £3.75 a game.PEARCEY wrote:I think the ST's represent good value especially for the under 12's. In a couple of seasons time I may well be in...
I'm certainly getting one and hoping I can get away with it for the 17th successive season....
Is it u16's? In a couple of years time when my lad is a bit older I will be looking for both of us to get ST's. The trouble is with so many mid-week games he's a bit young and plus I work late a lot of the time...but in a couple of years it will be worth doing.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 21 May 2010 07:03
21 May 2010 07:0310) £99 /23 = £4-30 a gameSun Tzu wrote:
The u12 (it's u16 isn't it ?) is very good value, i can;t imagin emany u16's who are more than casual fans not getting a ST when it is about £3.75 a game.
I'm certainly getting one and hoping I can get away with it for the 17th successive season....
by Big Foot » 21 May 2010 08:57
21 May 2010 08:57As a STH I'm hoping that they do away with match day tickets as I feel allowing people to just buy for certain games erodes the benefits I get from my ST. Anyone not prepared to fork out the full amount up front just shouldn;t be allowed to go to games. That is what 107is for.Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:
As said good value, about the price they should be IMHO, am hoping for a drop in match day prices, especially for adults, possibly as low as £19 pre booked.
by Big Foot » 21 May 2010 13:57
21 May 2010 13:57Thanks m8, I've filled that in but still need the application form from Ticket office I believe?
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 21 May 2010 16:33
21 May 2010 16:33Frankly I am almost in agreement with you, but untill we sell 90% of the allowed seats as ST again we are kinda buggered.Sun Tzu wrote:As a STH I'm hoping that they do away with match day tickets as I feel allowing people to just buy for certain games erodes the benefits I get from my ST. Anyone not prepared to fork out the full amount up front just shouldn;t be allowed to go to games. That is what 107is for.Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:
As said good value, about the price they should be IMHO, am hoping for a drop in match day prices, especially for adults, possibly as low as £19 pre booked.
by paultheroyal » 21 May 2010 20:44
21 May 2010 20:44by MR. CYNICAL » 21 May 2010 22:34
21 May 2010 22:34by Sarah Star » 22 May 2010 11:37
22 May 2010 11:37by Wycombe Royal » 25 May 2010 10:44
25 May 2010 10:44That has been the case since ST's went on sale for next season.....paultheroyal wrote:For those wanting a new season ticket, they are accepting them now despite website saying difficult.
Spare seats near us, new family member wants to join us and we have managed to nab the seat at £395.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests