It's a bit of both really. Obviously everyone chases big ratings (hence why X-Factor & BGT have basically saved ITV's bacon), but most advertisers tend to want to buy TV against an ABC1 audience. To attract this audience, in principle you would aim to produce slightly higher quality programming. Don't get me wrong, ABC1 is still pretty mass market, but it should be a little more sophisticated than the lowest common denominator as you put it.Dirk Gently wrote:True, I was dumbing down and over-simplifying, which is essentially what ITV tend to do.Seal wrote:Not quite that simple.Dirk Gently wrote:It's quite simple.
Commercial broadcasters exist to deliver viewers to their sponsors, not to deliver quality programming that their viewers want. One might lead to the other, but not always. But as the people who pay them are teh sponsors, and only indirectly the viewing audience, guess who gets the biggest say on a day-to-day basis?
Public service broadcasters exist to deliver quality programming to their viewers.
The worse ITV's coverage, the less viewers they get for games - especially later in the tournament when they go head to head and get trounced by BBC.
Therefore their viewing number are much lower, meaning lowers TVRs, which equals lower value of advertising spot, making them far less attractive for advertisers (and their TV buyers) and ultimately far lower ad revenues.
If the quality of programming was higher they could achieve far greater revenue. It always makes me astonished to see how poor their sport productions are (especially bearing in mind their budgets are comparable to BBC sport).
I'm aware you very much know what you're talking about in this area (*) - would you agree that for ITV it tends to be all about attaining sheer numbers rather than the demographics of the audience? Perhaps that's just a reflection of the typical products which latch onto football on TV for advertising. For them it's very much lowest common denominator, mass-market stuff, rather than anything quality-orientated.
(*) Except when saying less viewers!
Yes they have to try and guarantee commercial revenues, so in a worse case scenario they get 2/3 total England games.Silver Fox wrote:Don't ITV always hedge their bets and take 2 group games, meaning BBC get the 2nd round and quarter final?

Horrible, horrible man... according to Mick Goodingfloyd__streete wrote:No, what is currently getting my gander up is the McDonald's advert narrated by World Cup failure Graham Taylor. Graham, if I ever bump into you after watching that monstrosity then my fist will be just passing by your nose.
Okfloyd__streete wrote:LOL @ people getting upset and irritated by the pundits; switch on at kick off, have a poo at half time and switch off at the end. .
Errfloyd__streete wrote:No, what is currently getting my gander up is the McDonald's advert narrated by World Cup failure Graham Taylor.
Alan Shearer is on because he was an England star, and that's it entirely. I recall a piece on the BBC site where the producer was going on about how excited he was that England legend Alan Shearer was on the show. The fact that he didn't really have anything to say didn't seem to matter.6ft Kerplunk wrote:ALolan Shearer asking what they know about football. You migh know a lot Alan but you've got absolutely no idea about how to pass that knowledge on to a TV viewer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests