No, white is the abscence (sic) of colour. Black is an abscence (sic, again) of light.Ian Royal wrote: technically I believe it is the abscence of colour.
No, white is the abscence (sic) of colour. Black is an abscence (sic, again) of light.Ian Royal wrote: technically I believe it is the abscence of colour.
If you think he's mishit it and sliced it in why do you think it was an amazing goal?Thaumagurist* wrote:My jaw dropped when I saw the first goal, but it's pretty obvious he didn't intend to do it as he'd been looking to cross it. Still, it was an amazing goal.
I was amazed that a keeper at the WC was beaten at his near post. At least it wasn't an English keeping mistake....shitHoop Blah wrote:If you think he's mishit it and sliced it in why do you think it was an amazing goal?Thaumagurist* wrote:My jaw dropped when I saw the first goal, but it's pretty obvious he didn't intend to do it as he'd been looking to cross it. Still, it was an amazing goal.
In terms of light - white light is merely a broad range of lights of many wavelengths - i.e. consider the reverse of the prism experiment. There's also a black body radiation based derivativeTails wrote:No, white is the abscence (sic) of colour. Black is an abscence (sic, again) of light.Ian Royal wrote: technically I believe it is the abscence of colour.
It was an absolute pleasure.Tails wrote:Not-so-serious post is taken seriously - thanks all the same paps.
You reckon?Thaumagurist* wrote:My jaw dropped when I saw the first goal, but it's pretty obvious he didn't intend to do it as he'd been looking to cross it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests