sad sack all the wayPepe the Horseman wrote:Who's your favourite raggy doll, brendy?
by melonhead » 07 Aug 2014 11:06
07 Aug 2014 11:06sad sack all the wayPepe the Horseman wrote:Who's your favourite raggy doll, brendy?
by Pepe the Horseman » 07 Aug 2014 11:08
07 Aug 2014 11:08by melonhead » 07 Aug 2014 11:13
07 Aug 2014 11:13by Pepe the Horseman » 07 Aug 2014 11:16
07 Aug 2014 11:16by tidus_mi2 » 07 Aug 2014 11:24
07 Aug 2014 11:24Lol cut out the bit where I reckon we'll get promoted in 2-3 seasons! I don't by any means think we're in a relegation battle this season, I just can't see any more than a mid-table finish.melonhead wrote:tidus_mi2 wrote: it would be a miracle to go up this season, no new signings as of yet, even with ones coming in soon they won't have had time to integrate with the team and could face a slow start, even strengthening in January probably won't be enough.!![]()
cheer up sadsack
by Pseud O'Nym » 07 Aug 2014 11:39
07 Aug 2014 11:39So would you agree that Neil Innes was actually the most talented of the Bonzos? Although Stanshall was undoubtedly the more famous, Innes' oeuvre was much more diverse I feel.melonhead wrote:who is your favourite one?
edit: oops, was just typing this as you replied
his name is Hi-Fi. the coolest of thebunch
Pseud O'Nym wrote:So would you agree that Neil Innes was actually the most talented of the Bonzos? Although Stanshall was undoubtedly the more famous, Innes' oeuvre was much more diverse I feel.
by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2014 12:34
07 Aug 2014 12:34No doubt people will pretend this is some sort of guarantee of promotion by April.TFF wrote:Hold on to your hats folksSamrit wrote:Finally I am here, can't wait to start fighting for the new season 2014-2015. Let's go Reading & the Royals' great supporters. I wish we will be there together @ the end of this season...EPL!
by floyd__streete » 07 Aug 2014 12:49
07 Aug 2014 12:49Yep.RoyalBlue wrote:Even if we sign Mackie and Cox, Pog will remain by far and away the best striker we have on our books
by Royal Lady » 07 Aug 2014 13:30
07 Aug 2014 13:30by Albert Spangler » 07 Aug 2014 13:37
07 Aug 2014 13:37Samrit Bunditkitsada wrote:Sure we can go out for dinner. You like Thai?
Royal Lady wrote:Yeah, you like shirt?
by winchester_royal » 07 Aug 2014 15:56
07 Aug 2014 15:56A promising start to the Thai tenure.Charles Watts @charles_watts · 5m
Simon Cox signing is just the start, more to follow. Busy few weeks ahead #readingfc
And very pleasing he has been a long-time target of Adkins.winchester_royal wrote:A promising start to the Thai tenure.Charles Watts @charles_watts · 5m
Simon Cox signing is just the start, more to follow. Busy few weeks ahead #readingfc
by DaveBanana » 07 Aug 2014 17:12
07 Aug 2014 17:12by Royal Ginger » 08 Aug 2014 00:15
08 Aug 2014 00:15Whilst i don't doubt the assertion about the Russians, this statement is incorrect. Different circumstances when they were in charge, different point in Cox's career, we were also going into a different league when they were spending. So no, it tells us nothing about the previous owners.DaveBanana wrote:It also emphasises how shite the Russians were, given this is only rumoured to have been circa 600k...
by Royal Biscuitman » 08 Aug 2014 10:28
08 Aug 2014 10:28IIRC, clubs are not allowed to list players as assets (or liability!) on the balance sheets anymore as people can not be owned, however like staff working for any company they can be an intangible asset.... so while a club may make a £20m loss one season and have £20m less cash assets at the bank as a result, the accounts don't show that they now have £20m worth of players on the books.RoyalBlue wrote:Even if we sign Mackie and Cox, Pog will remain by far and away the best striker we have on our books - foolish to let him go unless we have signed someone significantly better than him.Royal Rother wrote:I would have thought someone would pay £2-3m for Pog.
If we let him go on a free, even though a new club may not match his current wages, I'd have thought that a Golden Hello of £2-3m would mean he covers whatever wage shortfall he might have over the period of a contract.
Nobody likes selling an asset for nothing but if we really want to get him off the payroll then I'm sure it could be done. He has no value on the Balance Sheet as nothing was paid for him, so it wouldn't have any real or cosmetic impact in the short term, but it would reduce the overhead.
Just a thought. Same applies with Drenthe I suppose.
by Norfolk Royal » 08 Aug 2014 12:47
08 Aug 2014 12:47Has been floated before so maybe some legs on that. It was only in May that he bought Valencia though for squillions.SPARTA wrote:Few rumours this man could be the 4th investor.
Peter Lim Eng Hock is a Singapore businessman and investor. In July 2010, Forbes magazine rated eighth amongst Singapore's 40 richest people with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion. Wikipedia
by El Diablo » 08 Aug 2014 13:00
08 Aug 2014 13:00If thats right then we have a seriously wealthy Sports fan on board..Norfolk Royal wrote:Has been floated before so maybe some legs on that. It was only in May that he bought Valencia though for squillions.SPARTA wrote:Few rumours this man could be the 4th investor.
Peter Lim Eng Hock is a Singapore businessman and investor. In July 2010, Forbes magazine rated eighth amongst Singapore's 40 richest people with an estimated net worth of $2.5 billion. Wikipedia
by Royal Rother » 08 Aug 2014 13:50
08 Aug 2014 13:50That's not the really case RB. An intangible asset has a value on the Balance Sheet. In the case of players, the signing on fees are shown as Intangible Assets, written off over the period of their contract.Royal Biscuitman wrote:IIRC, clubs are not allowed to list players as assets (or liability!) on the balance sheets anymore as people can not be owned, however like staff working for any company they can be an intangible asset.... so while a club may make a £20m loss one season and have £20m less cash assets at the bank as a result, the accounts don't show that they now have £20m worth of players on the books.RoyalBlue wrote:Even if we sign Mackie and Cox, Pog will remain by far and away the best striker we have on our books - foolish to let him go unless we have signed someone significantly better than him.Royal Rother wrote:I would have thought someone would pay £2-3m for Pog.
If we let him go on a free, even though a new club may not match his current wages, I'd have thought that a Golden Hello of £2-3m would mean he covers whatever wage shortfall he might have over the period of a contract.
Nobody likes selling an asset for nothing but if we really want to get him off the payroll then I'm sure it could be done. He has no value on the Balance Sheet as nothing was paid for him, so it wouldn't have any real or cosmetic impact in the short term, but it would reduce the overhead.
Just a thought. Same applies with Drenthe I suppose.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 94 guests