by ZacNaloen » 04 Sep 2014 12:53
04 Sep 2014 12:53by TheLawnMowerMan » 04 Sep 2014 12:56
04 Sep 2014 12:56by Royal Lady » 04 Sep 2014 12:58
04 Sep 2014 12:58by TheLawnMowerMan » 04 Sep 2014 12:59
04 Sep 2014 12:59Indeed, and a very valid point.ZacNaloen wrote:The loan could be from the Thais
by Royal Rother » 04 Sep 2014 13:00
04 Sep 2014 13:002 recently formed companies.Royal Lady wrote:2 charges have been registered against RFC? Really - by whom?
by Royal Lady » 04 Sep 2014 13:03
04 Sep 2014 13:03by Royal Rother » 04 Sep 2014 13:08
04 Sep 2014 13:08by floyd__streete » 04 Sep 2014 13:09
04 Sep 2014 13:09by Pepe the Horseman » 04 Sep 2014 13:20
04 Sep 2014 13:20by Royal Biscuitman » 04 Sep 2014 14:12
04 Sep 2014 14:12by RoyalBlue » 04 Sep 2014 14:14
04 Sep 2014 14:14So protecting their investment and ensuring that it isn't diluted by any further borrowing, other than with their consent. Seems fairly logical.Royal Rother wrote:2 recently formed companies.Royal Lady wrote:2 charges have been registered against RFC? Really - by whom?
Universal Fico Ltd (Director is Sumrith Thanakarnjanasuth)
and
GPT UK Investment Ltd (Director is Narin Niruttinanon)
Both are a fixed and floating charges over all assets and contain a negative pledge which prohibits any additional borrowing being taken out without the lender's approval.
by Royal Lady » 04 Sep 2014 14:37
04 Sep 2014 14:37LOL - his status does SEEM to be a description of SchardsRoyal Biscuitman wrote:Schards#2 might have something to say about that, unless RR's location refers to Schards#2 in which case it seems all 3 are getting along just fine.
by Pepe the Horseman » 04 Sep 2014 14:44
04 Sep 2014 14:44by Royal Lady » 04 Sep 2014 15:45
04 Sep 2014 15:45by Royal Biscuitman » 04 Sep 2014 16:16
04 Sep 2014 16:16by Pepe the Horseman » 04 Sep 2014 16:30
04 Sep 2014 16:30Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 220 guests