You do realise those advertisements are targeted at you based on your browsing history and interests...
by blueroyals » 08 Sep 2014 13:51
08 Sep 2014 13:51by wally bassoon » 08 Sep 2014 14:50
08 Sep 2014 14:50blueroyals wrote:![]()
You do realise those advertisements are targeted at you based on your browsing history and interests...
by Royal Rother » 08 Sep 2014 14:58
08 Sep 2014 14:58by RoyalBlue » 08 Sep 2014 16:42
08 Sep 2014 16:42Yeah, I thought that at the time. However, not guilty on this occasion as it is a work PC so the dodgiest website I view is HNA itself!wally bassoon wrote:blueroyals wrote:![]()
You do realise those advertisements are targeted at you based on your browsing history and interests...
Brilliant![]()
![]()
by Royal Biscuitman » 08 Sep 2014 16:55
08 Sep 2014 16:55Maybe you've watched a video with a cheerleader in?Royal Rother wrote:I've got an NFL Game Pass ad at the bottom and I have precisely ZERO interest in the NFL and have never browsed it.
(Thai ladies otoh.....)
by semtex1871 » 08 Sep 2014 19:46
08 Sep 2014 19:46by Royalwaster » 09 Sep 2014 11:34
09 Sep 2014 11:34I think those steps down are to leave early and not get stuck in the carpark ....semtex1871 wrote:apparently, the new owners have had 2 executive boxes knocked through into 1 big box, with steps leading directly down to the lower west so they can sit with the fans......
Or to try and beat the queue at half time.. #soupwatchRoyalwaster wrote:I think those steps down are to leave early and not get stuck in the carpark ....semtex1871 wrote:apparently, the new owners have had 2 executive boxes knocked through into 1 big box, with steps leading directly down to the lower west so they can sit with the fans......
Royal Blue by name...wally bassoon wrote:blueroyals wrote:![]()
You do realise those advertisements are targeted at you based on your browsing history and interests...
Brilliant![]()
![]()
by shaka's shorts » 09 Sep 2014 13:07
09 Sep 2014 13:07by RoyalBlue » 09 Sep 2014 14:25
09 Sep 2014 14:25Perhaps your assumed superior knowledge of these matters has affected your ability to read. Firstly, as I already explained above, I fully understand how ad targeting and behavioural targeting work. As I also explained, the PC would not have transmitted any information that would have directly led to that particular ad being targeted at it. And in the absence of such information, I very much suspect that the ads that will be displayed will be those that have been shown to attract the most attention (or adverts from the advertisers that pay most for their ads to appear) would have been displayed.shaka's shorts wrote:Oh dear - Royal Blue.... You clearly don't understand the world of display ad targeting on web sites and behavioural targeting. We all see different ads. The ads that you see are based on your previous behaviour on the web......
I see an add for the Park Inn hotel at Heathrow, where my meeting was held yesterday. You see something different:
"Well someone has a sense of humour - or maybe they know something that we don't know about how JM found our new owners:
The advert at the bottom of HNA's home page is for thaimatches.com - 'chat free with New Thai Ladies' "
Say no more......
by Royal Rother » 09 Sep 2014 14:37
09 Sep 2014 14:37You mean the one where she's in the locker room with her mature lesbian coach?Royal Biscuitman wrote:Maybe you've watched a video with a cheerleader in?Royal Rother wrote:I've got an NFL Game Pass ad at the bottom and I have precisely ZERO interest in the NFL and have never browsed it.
(Thai ladies otoh.....)
by Norfolk Royal » 09 Sep 2014 14:47
09 Sep 2014 14:47Link please.Royal Rother wrote:You mean the one where she's in the locker room with her mature lesbian coach?Royal Biscuitman wrote:Maybe you've watched a video with a cheerleader in?Royal Rother wrote:I've got an NFL Game Pass ad at the bottom and I have precisely ZERO interest in the NFL and have never browsed it.
(Thai ladies otoh.....)
Did you get a warning for inappropriate use of the office internet or are you now working from home full time ?RoyalBlue wrote:
As part of my job however, I did once google 'Disciplinary Codes of Practice' and got some interesting results, which had me frantically hitting the back button!
by Royal Biscuitman » 09 Sep 2014 16:04
09 Sep 2014 16:04by One Beer is never enough. » 10 Sep 2014 12:05
10 Sep 2014 12:05Full article - http://www1.skysports.com/football/news ... -play-fineShaun Harvey, Football league Chief Exec said:
Harvey also defended the Football League’s 'Owners’ and Directors’ test', designed to ensure that clubs are not managed or controlled by individuals who may present a risk to the club’s position.
Reading are currently awaiting the League’s ruling on a takeover of the club by a Thai consortium led by Samrit Bunditkitsada.
“With the owners and directors' test, the applications have been in from the directors and investors (in Reading). I don’t believe there’s anything that will cause any distress from that,” said Harvey.
“We are spending more time on the source and sufficiency of funding to ensure the club is appropriately funded going forward so we know whose money is going into the club.
“But the club is aware of these steps and I think they are quite satisfied with that.”
by tidus_mi2 » 10 Sep 2014 12:36
10 Sep 2014 12:36It's only meant to be SB holding it up too. It'll be done when it's done.tidus_mi2 wrote:I have no qualms with them taking their time, especially after the whole TSI fiasco, considering the transfer window has been and gone, there's no huge rush anyway, especially if this chap Shaun has basically said the owners and directors test looks fine and they just want to clarify proof of funding.
by GreaterTorontoRoyal » 10 Sep 2014 16:43
10 Sep 2014 16:43He's supposed to be in England tomorrow according to Facebook. With that news, an announcement may be made next week.SPARTA wrote:It's only meant to be SB holding it up too. It'll be done when it's done.tidus_mi2 wrote:I have no qualms with them taking their time, especially after the whole TSI fiasco, considering the transfer window has been and gone, there's no huge rush anyway, especially if this chap Shaun has basically said the owners and directors test looks fine and they just want to clarify proof of funding.
by Royal Biscuitman » 11 Sep 2014 11:54
11 Sep 2014 11:54Remember, they passed the test too.tidus_mi2 wrote:I have no qualms with them taking their time, especially after the whole TSI fiasco