Hence why I said I wouldn't be surprised if it opened up as an option. It was just explained to you.NathStPaul wrote:It isn't an option. Both the player and his agent have said that, it was just explained to you.
Hence why I said I wouldn't be surprised if it opened up as an option. It was just explained to you.NathStPaul wrote:It isn't an option. Both the player and his agent have said that, it was just explained to you.
Bore off. Immediately.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Hence why I said I wouldn't be surprised if it opened up as an option. It was just explained to you.NathStPaul wrote:It isn't an option. Both the player and his agent have said that, it was just explained to you.
"He can and will take the next step. Bayern, Real, Barcelona, City - these are the big clubs he can go to. City has won the championship five times in recent years, significantly more than United. When we moved to Dortmund, we all knew that this step would come."
The EFL should let him come on loan to Reading with Everton paying 100% of his wages, just to make Derby fans spontaneously combust with rage.Weymouth Royal wrote:Deli Ali advised to drop to the Championship to get his career back on track... What a numpty he is.
Agreed YR.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
Goes back to the question I've raised before - does a player want to win something simply by dint of being at a particularly club, or do they want to be a/the driving force behind a club doing so?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
I think that's why it ultimately hinges on what Lewandowski does this summer, if anything. He wouldn't go and play second choice to him and win a load of trophies with Bayern when he could go to City, star for them, potentially win less but contribute more. As mentioned, there is a balance for the very best players. However, if Bayern were to lose Lewandowski, he would certainly be an option for them I'd imagine.Sanguine wrote:Goes back to the question I've raised before - does a player want to win something simply by dint of being at a particularly club, or do they want to be a/the driving force behind a club doing so?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
And I do understand the desire for winners' medals, whatever the underlying motivation. I've cited Grealish before - he may pick up his first winners' medals this season, but what will his personal contribution to those be?
A la Gerrard (obviously without winning a PL)Sanguine wrote:Goes back to the question I've raised before - does a player want to win something simply by dint of being at a particularly club, or do they want to be a/the driving force behind a club doing so?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
And I do understand the desire for winners' medals, whatever the underlying motivation. I've cited Grealish before - he may pick up his first winners' medals this season, but what will his personal contribution to those be?
Ultimately each individual player is motivated by different factors. One being financial (which I’m sure PSG would triumph), one being trophies and personal accolades and another becoming a cult hero and sticking to 1/2 clubs (I.e. the emotional factor)South Coast Royal wrote:Agreed YR.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
How do you define ambition ,and what is his driving force?.
He isn't going to win anything with his national side so why not do a Lewandowski, score loads of goals every week, get paid well and most seasons have a real chance of winning the Champions League.?
Just because we see our top division as competitive, even if 3 teams have been way ahead of the rest for some time, he might not be so keen and who wouldn't prefer to live for a few years in Madrid, Barcelona, Paris or Munich rather than Manchester?
Those 3 factors are surely the same if he were to play in any country and I'm not sure why they can't be satisfied playing in Munich or Paris when compared with elsewhere.URZZZZ wrote:Ultimately each individual player is motivated by different factors. One being financial (which I’m sure PSG would triumph), one being trophies and personal accolades and another becoming a cult hero and sticking to 1/2 clubs (I.e. the emotional factor)South Coast Royal wrote:Agreed YR.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
How do you define ambition ,and what is his driving force?.
He isn't going to win anything with his national side so why not do a Lewandowski, score loads of goals every week, get paid well and most seasons have a real chance of winning the Champions League.?
Just because we see our top division as competitive, even if 3 teams have been way ahead of the rest for some time, he might not be so keen and who wouldn't prefer to live for a few years in Madrid, Barcelona, Paris or Munich rather than Manchester?
Personally think sticking in Germany/moving to Paris is a waste of a players potential, certainly in the long term but obviously other people think differently
Domestically I don't disagree, they aren't the divisions you want to be known for come the end of your career but the very best players will be known for their accolades. Muller (although across many years) for example is one who will be remembered for his time at Bayern. World class player, loyalty, trophies etc. I wouldn't say he wasted his potential either by sticking at Bayern for years, I think it just depends on how good the player is.URZZZZ wrote:Ultimately each individual player is motivated by different factors. One being financial (which I’m sure PSG would triumph), one being trophies and personal accolades and another becoming a cult hero and sticking to 1/2 clubs (I.e. the emotional factor)South Coast Royal wrote:Agreed YR.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
How do you define ambition ,and what is his driving force?.
He isn't going to win anything with his national side so why not do a Lewandowski, score loads of goals every week, get paid well and most seasons have a real chance of winning the Champions League.?
Just because we see our top division as competitive, even if 3 teams have been way ahead of the rest for some time, he might not be so keen and who wouldn't prefer to live for a few years in Madrid, Barcelona, Paris or Munich rather than Manchester?
Personally think sticking in Germany/moving to Paris is a waste of a players potential, certainly in the long term but obviously other people think differently
To be fair, given OMAs track record of saying things and the exact opposite happening, you'd be wise to bet he'll go to Bayern MunichHendo wrote:Weird that Raiola said this just 3 months ago -"He can and will take the next step. Bayern, Real, Barcelona, City - these are the big clubs he can go to. City has won the championship five times in recent years, significantly more than United. When we moved to Dortmund, we all knew that this step would come."
Can't find anything after a bit of googling anyone ruling out the move. Although it would obviously depend on Lewandowski leaving.
Also sounds like Oliver Kahn has met Raiola recently and discussed Haaland - https://www.bavarianfootballworks.com/2 ... raoui-sane
c4yURZZZZ wrote:A la Gerrard (obviously without winning a PL)Sanguine wrote:Goes back to the question I've raised before - does a player want to win something simply by dint of being at a particularly club, or do they want to be a/the driving force behind a club doing so?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He'd be playing for Bayern though, it's only the same as players making the move over to PSG. Even Spain isn't as great as it used to be these days, so what would that mean about a move to Madrid?
Every league can be considered weak when you compare it to the PL. You don't move to a Bayern, PSG etc to just be the best in your domestic league, you do it to win the biggest trophies in Europe whilst consistently winning trophies. You could argue he'd do more of that at Bayern than City considering it's not a given that City will win the league each season and they've never won the CL either.
It would only ever happen if Lewandowski moved, that's when it could potentially become an option. I'm not sure why that was such a problem to suggest for some.
And I do understand the desire for winners' medals, whatever the underlying motivation. I've cited Grealish before - he may pick up his first winners' medals this season, but what will his personal contribution to those be?
Could have gone to Chelsea to become part of a side ready to win trophies but stayed at Liverpool and became a cunt.
Oh come off of it, it was a funny joke (yet true).NathStPaul wrote:Oh dear, back on ignore you go.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 31 guests