confirmed this a while agoLoafer wrote:exclusive.............
My sources directly INSIDE the club have said Haaland to city is DONE
no it was not, nobody confirmed he had actually signed itBROB0T wrote:confirmed this a while agoLoafer wrote:exclusive.............
My sources directly INSIDE the club have said Haaland to city is DONE
from sources directly inside the lobby with the TV
posted a while back it was a done dealLoafer wrote:no it was not, nobody confirmed he had actually signed itBROB0T wrote:confirmed this a while agoLoafer wrote:exclusive.............
My sources directly INSIDE the club have said Haaland to city is DONE
from sources directly inside the lobby with the TV
I am telling you , my sources who I know who work INSIDE the club and have DIRECT access to players AND information, have confirmed this, and I have the pictures and evidence
Absolutely, but Pep has a skill of evolving, moving ahead of everyone else - maybe this is the next phase in that process.South Coast Royal wrote:It will be interesting next season to see if Haaland makes that much difference to a City team that will probably win the title with around 95 points.
This idea that a striker was badly needed (after the non-signing of Kane) strikes me as questionable in that there will have to be quite a change to their style of play having existed without a target man for years-Aguero was hardly your normal big man up front.
City play neat interchange football with their strikers being more like midfielders so it is not a gimme that Haaland and City will be the perfect fit, just as free-scoring Lukaku was considered last year to be Chelsea's final piece of the jigsaw meaning that many pundits had them as title favourites.
However it pans out, it is good for English football to be able to see him playing here.
Are you sure about that ?Sanguine wrote:Continue to be 'perplexed' then. I'm not naive. I know what runs the game and I know how the game has changed in the last generation. It's just the football romantic in me.
Messi was very much part of what made his Barca sides great. They had won two titles in ten years when he debuted. They won six of the next ten, and ten of the next fifteen. Likewise United won one PL in six years before and during Ronaldo's emergence as a world-class player, and he ended his United career having driven the team to three successive titles.
Maybe Haaland will finally drag City a Champions League. Good on him. But this 'all routes lead to City/Real*/PSG' isn't for me.
*see the inevitable Mbappe transfer this summer.
No whoosh, my point was that for United in that era they went through a (relative!) lean patch, winning it in 02-03 before he arrived, and then not again until 06-07, which was also the season in which the world class goalscorer Ronaldo really emerged. He scored 100 goals across three seasons from that year, and United won three titles in a row.Franchise FC wrote:Are you sure about that ?Sanguine wrote:Continue to be 'perplexed' then. I'm not naive. I know what runs the game and I know how the game has changed in the last generation. It's just the football romantic in me.
Messi was very much part of what made his Barca sides great. They had won two titles in ten years when he debuted. They won six of the next ten, and ten of the next fifteen. Likewise United won one PL in six years before and during Ronaldo's emergence as a world-class player, and he ended his United career having driven the team to three successive titles.
Maybe Haaland will finally drag City a Champions League. Good on him. But this 'all routes lead to City/Real*/PSG' isn't for me.
*see the inevitable Mbappe transfer this summer.
He signed in 2003, after they'd won 7 of the previous 10, including a set of 3 in a row (99, 00 and 01
I'm sure you'll send me a whoosh if I've been hooked
OK, but in terms of joining a club Ronaldo joined United at a very similar point to Haaland joining City. Indeed, it could be argued that United were more dominant then than City are nowSanguine wrote:No whoosh, my point was that for United in that era they went through a (relative!) lean patch, winning it in 02-03 before he arrived, and then not again until 06-07, which was also the season in which the world class goalscorer Ronaldo really emerged. He scored 100 goals across three seasons from that year, and United won three titles in a row.Franchise FC wrote:Are you sure about that ?Sanguine wrote:Continue to be 'perplexed' then. I'm not naive. I know what runs the game and I know how the game has changed in the last generation. It's just the football romantic in me.
Messi was very much part of what made his Barca sides great. They had won two titles in ten years when he debuted. They won six of the next ten, and ten of the next fifteen. Likewise United won one PL in six years before and during Ronaldo's emergence as a world-class player, and he ended his United career having driven the team to three successive titles.
Maybe Haaland will finally drag City a Champions League. Good on him. But this 'all routes lead to City/Real*/PSG' isn't for me.
*see the inevitable Mbappe transfer this summer.
He signed in 2003, after they'd won 7 of the previous 10, including a set of 3 in a row (99, 00 and 01
I'm sure you'll send me a whoosh if I've been hooked
Can’t disagree with thatSanguine wrote:Fair enough. I don't agree, but see your argument. We are in an era of 'super clubs' now more so than merely 'dominant' teams. As I've tried to say, I do understand why players join these clubs, I just think it is a shame for football. The longer it continues, the bigger our strides towards a super league.
Loafer wrote:and once again, my sources are correct and I am FIRST with the official news about Haaland
Even UEFA themselves are geared towards this as well by potentially changing the Champions League so that the two "best coefficient" teams that finish outside their respective positions in their own league can qualify for the competition. Rightfully met with plenty of criticism, although it looks to be happening, but just not how they originally intended and it looks as if the criteria will change for that.Sanguine wrote:Fair enough. I don't agree, but see your argument. We are in an era of 'super clubs' now more so than merely 'dominant' teams. As I've tried to say, I do understand why players join these clubs, I just think it is a shame for football. The longer it continues, the bigger our strides towards a super league.
BBC Sports Football website full-on Haaland lovepaultheroyal wrote:Loafer wrote:and once again, my sources are correct and I am FIRST with the official news about Haaland
well done - you nailed that one.
Amazing signing for Man City and the Premier League.
AthleticoSpizz wrote:BBC Sports Football website full-on Haaland lovepaultheroyal wrote:Loafer wrote:and once again, my sources are correct and I am FIRST with the official news about Haaland
well done - you nailed that one.
Amazing signing for Man City and the Premier League.
Just the six leading features![]()
£51 million don’t ya know………
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests