Surprised Liverpool didn't go for him...........yappy wrote:Bloody good replacement if true!
This. But then nothing much at Liverpool makes sense. Reported they will fight for the £10m signature of a 17 year old from Southampton, whilst struggling to meet a £17m valuation for Uruguay striker Luis Suarez.TBM wrote:Surprised Liverpool didn't go for him...........yappy wrote:Bloody good replacement if true!
This, absolutely.Mr Angry wrote:
Regardless of anyone's thoughts on his abilities (or otherwise) as a Manager, NO-ONE deserves to be treated like this by their employer; shabby doesn't even begin to describe how West Ham's Directors have behaved.
Agreed.Gloria Gooner wrote:This, absolutely.Mr Angry wrote:
Regardless of anyone's thoughts on his abilities (or otherwise) as a Manager, NO-ONE deserves to be treated like this by their employer; shabby doesn't even begin to describe how West Ham's Directors have behaved.
Sullivan, Gold and Brady. I cannot think of another management team I'd rather work for less than this lot.Man Friday wrote:Agreed.Gloria Gooner wrote:This, absolutely.Mr Angry wrote:
Regardless of anyone's thoughts on his abilities (or otherwise) as a Manager, NO-ONE deserves to be treated like this by their employer; shabby doesn't even begin to describe how West Ham's Directors have behaved.
pretty crap journalism in the first place probablyMr Angry wrote: Make of that what you will!
More like MoN refused to speak to them at all whilst there was a manager already there.6ft Kerplunk wrote:Martin O'Neill has told them where to stuff it after Grant's sacking was leaked?
Whatever has happened, it would have been very easy - and more settling for the team - for the board to have very quickly denied the rumours that Grant was going. Seems to me that they were seriously hedging their bets and it's backfired.PieEater wrote:More like MoN refused to speak to them at all whilst there was a manager already there.6ft Kerplunk wrote:Martin O'Neill has told them where to stuff it after Grant's sacking was leaked?
I heard that story this morning and thought I had misheard!! If true (usual proviso etc etc) then that is outrageous! If a player can get charged for a twitter entry (and quite rightly) then I would have thought that Ms Brady is a racing cert for an FA charge of bringing the game into disrepute.The whole year inn wrote:Latest development from the redtops, Brady has been sending texts to senior players encouraging them to start a revolt against Grant
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests