+1 to this, excellent first XI but they do look a bit thin on the ground when looking at their squad.genome wrote:Don't think Tottenham should get any stick. Great, English talent and spend fcuk all on wages (in the grand scheme), don't break the bank in transfer fees, and they have been excellent this season. Just need a bit more depth in the squad to go the long haul.
Looks like we've unearthed another Arsenal fan. They weren't ever top btw, don't really think you can bottle something you're chasing.Royality creeps In wrote:Tottenham = Bottle job AGAIN.
Still never mind eh.
Exactly. If a game isn't going Chelsea's way they can bring a Willian or Pedro off the bench to change the game. Spurs don't really have that.Hendo wrote:+1 to this, excellent first XI but they do look a bit thin on the ground when looking at their squad.genome wrote:Don't think Tottenham should get any stick. Great, English talent and spend fcuk all on wages (in the grand scheme), don't break the bank in transfer fees, and they have been excellent this season. Just need a bit more depth in the squad to go the long haul.
Need to not draw so many games.
And That's why they will never win the leaguegenome wrote:Exactly. If a game isn't going Chelsea's way they can bring a Willian or Pedro off the bench to change the game. Spurs don't really have that.Hendo wrote:+1 to this, excellent first XI but they do look a bit thin on the ground when looking at their squad.genome wrote:Don't think Tottenham should get any stick. Great, English talent and spend fcuk all on wages (in the grand scheme), don't break the bank in transfer fees, and they have been excellent this season. Just need a bit more depth in the squad to go the long haul.
Need to not draw so many games.
+2Hendo wrote:+1 to this, excellent first XI but they do look a bit thin on the ground when looking at their squad.genome wrote:Don't think Tottenham should get any stick. Great, English talent and spend fcuk all on wages (in the grand scheme), don't break the bank in transfer fees, and they have been excellent this season. Just need a bit more depth in the squad to go the long haul.
Need to not draw so many games.
Always happy to laugh at Spurs but it was already Chelsea's title. Have you seen their run-in?double d wrote:Well thats Chelsea's league title won then pretty much. Another year and another 'best team ever' that cannot win a trophy.
For the match at Wembley Tottenham will be the home team while in the reverse fixture at the London Stadium The Hammers will be the hostsexileinleeds wrote: Can we now discuss who is 'home' or 'away ' when they play WHU next season? Which team will have the most/loudest fans? Can either team generate an atmosphere?
I know right. I don't recall so much fuss or a closing down ceremony when Stamford Bridge was redeveloped to what it is now. Although I think WHU set a precedence with the move from The Boleyn Ground to the London stadium (although that was different as they actually moved). All that razzmatazz is expected now.Sutekh wrote:Getting a bit sick of all this totally over the top nonsense about WHL closing that the media keep spewing
Spurs are only moving about 50 yards to the right of the current pitch not miles away
My only miftness is around all this 'the lane' business. I know 2 spurs fans who have only ever referred to it by its full name, but in the last 2 weeks they are all about 'The Lane'.Sutekh wrote:Getting a bit sick of all this totally over the top nonsense about WHL closing that the media keep spewing
Spurs are only moving about 50 yards to the right of the current pitch not miles away
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests