Market value obviously depends on his form and goals between now and January.John Smith wrote:If someone wants to buy one of our players based on 4 appearances for £25m then I would bite their hand off.
The cynic in me thinks the club might have had this in mind at the time of the deal.John Smith wrote:If someone wants to buy one of our players based on 4 appearances for £25m then I would bite their hand off.
As in they thought he might be quite good for us and other teams would be interested? Certainly is a change in thinking from recent past transfers I guess.Tilehurstsouthbank wrote:The cynic in me thinks the club might have had this in mind at the time of the deal.John Smith wrote:If someone wants to buy one of our players based on 4 appearances for £25m then I would bite their hand off.
Lol. I get how that sounded. I meant in the very short term. when we paid £x for a up and coming young striker for Inter, didn't anyone else think, 'WTF'? If the owners and Kia K knew there would be bigger clubs sniffing around very quickly if the player did well, then we should probably at least double our money, even if it is only six months later. If he took time to settle and had a very mediocre start, he's on a five year contract so he would have plenty of time to settle and improve.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:As in they thought he might be quite good for us and other teams would be interested? Certainly is a change in thinking from recent past transfers I guess.Tilehurstsouthbank wrote:The cynic in me thinks the club might have had this in mind at the time of the deal.John Smith wrote:If someone wants to buy one of our players based on 4 appearances for £25m then I would bite their hand off.
What a difference a few weeks make. He looks totally useless at the moment.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:From what we've seen so far the guy is very good indeed.
For half an hour against CardiffRoyal Rother wrote:How long did he look good?
I have made my mind up already, He is GashSnowflake Royal wrote:We don't exactly try to play to his strengths, or give him a decent partner to work with. Or feed him much but scraps.
Exactly thisSnowflake Royal wrote:We don't exactly try to play to his strengths, or give him a decent partner to work with. Or feed him much but scraps.
Well that's shock.72 bus wrote:I have made my mind up already, He is GashSnowflake Royal wrote:We don't exactly try to play to his strengths, or give him a decent partner to work with. Or feed him much but scraps.
Multiple times yesterday there was space for him to make runs behind the Swansea defence...he didn’t move, barely gave the midfield an option, resulting in them losing the ball or going backwards.Snowflake Royal wrote:We don't exactly try to play to his strengths, or give him a decent partner to work with. Or feed him much but scraps.
This.Snowflake Royal wrote:Don't think his miss against Swansea was inexcusable either.
Bit of a loose ball on the up he had to snatch at, possibly a bit behind him.
Obviously you want it to go in and I expect if he was getting good service and we were playing well it would have done.
I agree he's clearly got more quality than he's showing, but I think you're both going too easy on him. We have created good chances for him against Charlton, Boro, Blackburn and Swansea and he hasn't been hitting the target. It's reasonable to expect more.Hound wrote:Exactly thisSnowflake Royal wrote:We don't exactly try to play to his strengths, or give him a decent partner to work with. Or feed him much but scraps.
He’s obviously a quality player - his performances for Romania show that
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 236 guests