by BR2 » 28 Apr 2009 09:30
28 Apr 2009 09:30by Avon Royal » 28 Apr 2009 09:54
28 Apr 2009 09:54by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 28 Apr 2009 10:04
28 Apr 2009 10:04by Deathy » 28 Apr 2009 10:06
28 Apr 2009 10:06by MartinRdg » 28 Apr 2009 10:07
28 Apr 2009 10:07Of course, the Derby and Norwich pitches were very good.........The Real Sandhurst Royal wrote:Let's stop blaming the pitch at the MAD STAD.
The style of play set out by the manager in February and March has been our downfall. We played with no creative midfield nor width against Preston, Bristol City, Notts Forest, Charlton and Barnsley.
Our last two away performances at Derby and Norwich have put that right.
Bring on the Brum.
by Sun Tzu » 28 Apr 2009 10:08
28 Apr 2009 10:08by Snowball » 28 Apr 2009 10:19
28 Apr 2009 10:19by Murts-is-Lej » 28 Apr 2009 11:17
28 Apr 2009 11:17by Sun Tzu » 28 Apr 2009 11:40
28 Apr 2009 11:40by Hoop Blah » 28 Apr 2009 12:43
28 Apr 2009 12:43The pitch doesn't help us, but they really are over playing the effect it has.Snowball wrote:Murty on the radio a week or so ago was very specific.
He said that bobbles etc meant one touch becoming two and that players
were pinging it long to avoid making a mistake getting caught in possession in our half
If you listened to the interviews after Derby, Kits said the players got together
and decided between themselves to play it more on the floor, play more football
BECAUSE THE PITCH WAS SO GOOD.
A similar thing was said before the Norwich game. Better pitch, better play, suited Reading's players.
On TV Murts said the pitch would benefit Reading.
In the pre-match Coppel joked about hoping Norwich didn't sabotage the pitch to stop our better play
The Mad Stad pitch should be improving already with the extra sun and rain and less rugby
by Thaumagurist* » 28 Apr 2009 13:29
28 Apr 2009 13:29
by RoyalBlue » 28 Apr 2009 13:43
28 Apr 2009 13:43Added to that, Nigel Worthington said that during his time at Norwich, he felt that the almost perfect pitch at Carrow Road often worked against Norwich as it enabled the more skilful teams to play their best football.Snowball wrote:Murty on the radio a week or so ago was very specific.
He said that bobbles etc meant one touch becoming two and that players
were pinging it long to avoid making a mistake getting caught in possession in our half
If you listened to the interviews after Derby, Kits said the players got together
and decided between themselves to play it more on the floor, play more football
BECAUSE THE PITCH WAS SO GOOD.
A similar thing was said before the Norwich game. Better pitch, better play, suited Reading's players.
On TV Murts said the pitch would benefit Reading.
In the pre-match Coppel joked about hoping Norwich didn't sabotage the pitch to stop our better play
The Mad Stad pitch should be improving already with the extra sun and rain and less rugby
by Dirk Gently » 28 Apr 2009 13:46
28 Apr 2009 13:46Agreed, but the real problem comes when our players start beliveing that our pitch is a problem.Hoop Blah wrote:The pitch doesn't help us, but they really are over playing the effect it has.Snowball wrote:Murty on the radio a week or so ago was very specific.
He said that bobbles etc meant one touch becoming two and that players
were pinging it long to avoid making a mistake getting caught in possession in our half
If you listened to the interviews after Derby, Kits said the players got together
and decided between themselves to play it more on the floor, play more football
BECAUSE THE PITCH WAS SO GOOD.
A similar thing was said before the Norwich game. Better pitch, better play, suited Reading's players.
On TV Murts said the pitch would benefit Reading.
In the pre-match Coppel joked about hoping Norwich didn't sabotage the pitch to stop our better play
The Mad Stad pitch should be improving already with the extra sun and rain and less rugby
That Murty explains it further doesn't make it right Snowball, it just means the excuse has some decent reasoning behind it. Our players haven't played well enough on it and thats the real issue.
by Sun Tzu » 28 Apr 2009 13:50
28 Apr 2009 13:50by The Quiet Man » 28 Apr 2009 14:18
28 Apr 2009 14:18by Barry the bird boggler » 28 Apr 2009 14:23
28 Apr 2009 14:23Thank god they're ripping up Wembley's pitch and relaying it in time for the FA Trophy Final in a couple of weeks then!Snowball wrote:Murty on the radio a week or so ago was very specific.
He said that bobbles etc meant one touch becoming two and that players
were pinging it long to avoid making a mistake getting caught in possession in our half
If you listened to the interviews after Derby, Kits said the players got together
and decided between themselves to play it more on the floor, play more football
BECAUSE THE PITCH WAS SO GOOD.
A similar thing was said before the Norwich game. Better pitch, better play, suited Reading's players.
On TV Murts said the pitch would benefit Reading.
In the pre-match Coppel joked about hoping Norwich didn't sabotage the pitch to stop our better play
The Mad Stad pitch should be improving already with the extra sun and rain and less rugby
by Hoop Blah » 28 Apr 2009 15:56
28 Apr 2009 15:56True enough.Dirk Gently wrote:Agreed, but the real problem comes when our players start beliveing that our pitch is a problem.Hoop Blah wrote:The pitch doesn't help us, but they really are over playing the effect it has.Snowball wrote:Murty on the radio a week or so ago was very specific.
He said that bobbles etc meant one touch becoming two and that players
were pinging it long to avoid making a mistake getting caught in possession in our half
If you listened to the interviews after Derby, Kits said the players got together
and decided between themselves to play it more on the floor, play more football
BECAUSE THE PITCH WAS SO GOOD.
A similar thing was said before the Norwich game. Better pitch, better play, suited Reading's players.
On TV Murts said the pitch would benefit Reading.
In the pre-match Coppel joked about hoping Norwich didn't sabotage the pitch to stop our better play
The Mad Stad pitch should be improving already with the extra sun and rain and less rugby
That Murty explains it further doesn't make it right Snowball, it just means the excuse has some decent reasoning behind it. Our players haven't played well enough on it and thats the real issue.
Whether it is or not is irrelevant in that case, because just thinking it is a problem makes it one. Confidence is all!
by Sarah Star » 28 Apr 2009 18:08
28 Apr 2009 18:08by BR2 » 29 Apr 2009 14:53
29 Apr 2009 14:53As I said earlier why not practice on the actual pitch?Sarah Star wrote:Would it help if they practiced on a pitch in the same condition? I know of one in Reading they could get to quite easily.
by BR2 » 29 Apr 2009 15:04
29 Apr 2009 15:04Other people seem quite happy to discuss the topic but then they are probably normal Reading fans with the emphasis on "normal".Thaumagurist* wrote:Boring BR2 pops up again. Why have you started yet another thread about the pitch when there is a perfectly good 10 page thread about it?
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 83 guests