by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 18:29
05 Oct 2019 18:29Agree. Same for Allegri.Snowflake Royal wrote:If Hughton is actually interested ditch Gomes now.
But I fear he can and will do better.
That’s true of most clubs though. Doubt anyone wants to keep sacking managers - and personally was Stam in until it became untenable and likewise never called for Clarke, McD or Clement to go of the recent managersSCIAG wrote:I think sacking the manager is both ineffective and not the sort of club I want us to be.
If we can get someone with a proven track record like Hughton or Hughes then that's one thing. But I suspect we'd just get another journeyman off the merry-go-round and be in the same position in 12 months. Stam was our chance to break the cycle but look what happened there.
Let's give someone a chance for once. Imagine if we'd sacked Coppell after that dreadful run in his second season?
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 18:34
05 Oct 2019 18:34this, let’s give Gomes that chance.SCIAG wrote:I think sacking the manager is both ineffective and not the sort of club I want us to be.
If we can get someone with a proven track record like Hughton or Hughes then that's one thing. But I suspect we'd just get another journeyman off the merry-go-round and be in the same position in 12 months. Stam was our chance to break the cycle but look what happened there.
Let's give someone a chance for once. Imagine if we'd sacked Coppell after that dreadful run in his second season?
OI!!!!!WoodleyRoyal wrote:Fans getting restless, should he go now? International break coming up....
by Denver Royal » 05 Oct 2019 18:54
05 Oct 2019 18:54Actually, I don't think our experiences with Gomes should necessarily preclude us getting another foreign manager. (Providing he was the right manager, of course).Ascotexgunner wrote:Its time we had someone who isn't new to English football and management and instead have someone with a proven track record in this country. Ainsworth as second choice.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 18:54
05 Oct 2019 18:54by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 18:56
05 Oct 2019 18:56by Eaststandman » 05 Oct 2019 18:56
05 Oct 2019 18:56He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.NewCorkSeth wrote:No ian Royal option? No vote then.
What we would lose undressing room morale we would make up for in tactical astuteness. And he would make damn sure the players names were spelled correctly.sandman wrote:He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.NewCorkSeth wrote:No ian Royal option? No vote then.
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:01
05 Oct 2019 19:01CH, yes granted...but he’s been sacked time and time again,.Eaststandman wrote:Gomes was a surprise appointment and he surprised everybody on the back of a less than spectacular personal history and track record, fair play!
Results and a lack of a worthwhile plan a, b or c indicate that he should not be surprised to receive his P45
CH would be a good, experienced alternative, he talks the talk, walks the walk and deserves the sort of loyalty and backing lesser lights have enjoyed!
Thanks, but Gomes out, sorry!
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:02
05 Oct 2019 19:02sandman wrote:He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.NewCorkSeth wrote:No ian Royal option? No vote then.
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:08
05 Oct 2019 19:08by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 19:10
05 Oct 2019 19:10Not in the case of Gomes, seeing as he actually deserves to go and doesn't look like he could build a sandcastle.AthleticoSpizz wrote:...and that’s the problem right there.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 19:12
05 Oct 2019 19:12I couldn't do much worse than one point in six games.sandman wrote:He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.NewCorkSeth wrote:No ian Royal option? No vote then.
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:13
05 Oct 2019 19:13“deserves to go” ?Snowflake Royal wrote:Not in the case of Gomes, seeing as he actually deserves to go and doesn't look like he could build a sandcastle.AthleticoSpizz wrote:...and that’s the problem right there.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 19:15
05 Oct 2019 19:15Take a quick look at the results in the last six games. Then the last 30 odd.AthleticoSpizz wrote:“deserves to go” ?Snowflake Royal wrote:Not in the case of Gomes, seeing as he actually deserves to go and doesn't look like he could build a sandcastle.AthleticoSpizz wrote:...and that’s the problem right there.
Anyways...you’ve got my vote already
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 154 guests