No, it's Boyce-Clarke mateCountryRoyal wrote:Can I just say, Nelson Abbey <3
Also I’ve been pronouncing Boyce-Clarke’s name wrong. It’s Con-eye-uh not Con-ya.
Tossergenome wrote:No, it's Boyce-Clarke mateCountryRoyal wrote:Can I just say, Nelson Abbey <3
Also I’ve been pronouncing Boyce-Clarke’s name wrong. It’s Con-eye-uh not Con-ya.
We'll find out if Button is here for a bit of experience or if he's the intended first choice I suppose.RG30 wrote:Late to the thread but thought we were superb last night and after the small sample size of 180 minutes competitive football under Selles, I am quietly optimistic now we’ll be better than many of us anticipated. We appear to have a coach who is has done the hard yards around the world and has a clear playing identity and style they wish to implement.
Plenty of positives to take away but thought Abbey and Bindon were in particular exceptional. Big Kelvin had Cooper on his arse all game and once again worked really hard for the team. Boyce-Clarke made a couple of nice saves and based on yesterday I think I’d have had him starting over Bouzanis this Saturday.
Agree. IMO there is still a significant and important role for Andy Carroll to play in this squad. It gives Selles a Plan B as well. Furthermore, whilst some of the brute centre halves in this league may get away with bullying our youngsters, they won't be able to adopt the same tactics with AC!Chameleon wrote:From the little I've seen of Hunt's U21s they also play with a big press - this was an extremely good result but it does show the benefits of the first team playing in a very similar style to the youth team; you're not asking them to play against much harder opposition and totally change styles, just the former. While Selles may still not last the season it shows the benefits of Bowen - having a DoF who recruits players and managers for a particular type of play is just a vast improvement on the past 5 years of bringing in a new manager with an incompatible style which just stunts youth team players from being able to take chances, and leaves us with a few players who just wouldn't be good under the new manager.
Outside of Carroll we have a squad all perfect for playing a high press, and Carroll's still a very good L1 striker, is decent at pressing and is quite a problem for defenders when the ball is crossed in.
There was a story around a few weeks back that we were after an experienced keeper who could be happy on the bench as we wanting to give one of the younger keepers a run as #1. Button could fit that mould, wasn't playing at WBA and apparently his family stayed around London, so even if he doesn't play, he can be home with his family again.tidus_mi2 wrote:We'll find out if Button is here for a bit of experience or if he's the intended first choice I suppose.RG30 wrote:Late to the thread but thought we were superb last night and after the small sample size of 180 minutes competitive football under Selles, I am quietly optimistic now we’ll be better than many of us anticipated. We appear to have a coach who is has done the hard yards around the world and has a clear playing identity and style they wish to implement.
Plenty of positives to take away but thought Abbey and Bindon were in particular exceptional. Big Kelvin had Cooper on his arse all game and once again worked really hard for the team. Boyce-Clarke made a couple of nice saves and based on yesterday I think I’d have had him starting over Bouzanis this Saturday.
I think that was the biggest attacking improvement over the past few seasons: we looked to get the ball forward quickly once we got the ball and caught Millwall out because of it, as opposed to slowing the game down and allowing the opposition to get back in to their defensive shape.Hound wrote:10m highlights on tbe main site well worth a watch
The constant hunting down whenever millwall on the ball, even in the last min at 4-0 up, is a real pleasure to see. Three of the goals came from robbing back possession and quickly breaking. Excellent stuff
genome wrote:No, it's Boyce-Clarke mateCountryRoyal wrote:Can I just say, Nelson Abbey <3
Also I’ve been pronouncing Boyce-Clarke’s name wrong. It’s Con-eye-uh not Con-ya.
Lol as I was reading it I was thinking how tf can you pronounce Boyce-Clarke wrong?CountryRoyal wrote:Tossergenome wrote:No, it's Boyce-Clarke mateCountryRoyal wrote:Can I just say, Nelson Abbey <3
Also I’ve been pronouncing Boyce-Clarke’s name wrong. It’s Con-eye-uh not Con-ya.
No it's definitely Boyce-ClarkeCountryRoyal wrote:Tossergenome wrote:
No, it's Boyce-Clarke mate
At this stage of last season Camara slipped a great through ball for Kelvin E to score. Not sure he saw any game time in the league after that and Kelvin saw very little. It's absolutely on Ince.Hound wrote:Sadly it wasn’t just Ince. Most disappointing non selection of the year for me was when Hunt dropped Camara totally after a poor 45Sutekh wrote:This. Ince really was working far to closely to that old Alan Hansen "mantra" last season.Snowflake Royal wrote: Well Camara, Kelvin, Craig, Abbey and Azeez were all involved in the Championship last season. Nowhere near enough of course.
Camara who was whoscored motm, scored, big part in the second goal, and assisted Vickers missed chance which he should have scored last night
Give them a run, give them confidence and they’ll be fine
How dare you cast aspersions on King Vickers.Hound wrote:Sadly it wasn’t just Ince. Most disappointing non selection of the year for me was when Hunt dropped Camara totally after a poor 45Sutekh wrote:This. Ince really was working far to closely to that old Alan Hansen "mantra" last season.Snowflake Royal wrote: Well Camara, Kelvin, Craig, Abbey and Azeez were all involved in the Championship last season. Nowhere near enough of course.
Camara who was whoscored motm, scored, big part in the second goal, and assisted Vickers missed chance which he should have scored last night
Give them a run, give them confidence and they’ll be fine
Ooh, ooh, NorthamptonSutekh wrote:That stat applies to league games only though, the first test of it arrives when visiting Northampton in October.Royal_jimmy wrote:It's been years since we've seen a Reading team play with this much energy, I saw it on Saturday, albeit as someone else mentioned we didn't execute it that well because of a lack of pre-season for the incomers but could see what we were trying to do. I can see why Selles likes this style of play as he has a fitness coach background, we'll see some stronger fitter players this season hopefully.
I'll be disappointed but not surprised if 5-6 of them are relegated to the bench for Saturday. Can't expect them to sustain that Saturday/Tuesday.
If we end up midtable this season but play with the energy and excitement with a young side with plenty of growth to come then I'll take that. We'll hammer some teams but we'll see some poor results. No idea what contracts some of the youngsters like Abbey, CBC, Craig, Kelvin E and Vickers are on but we should get them tied down to a longer deal now we're no longer under an embargo!
Oh and we finally won a midweek away game at a team not beginning with B
The drop down a level will probably do a lot of them the world of good to be fair. I suspect more will be suited to this level at the moment.Hound wrote:Obviously ince was v poor at the player management of the young players - but the message sent by Hunt was extremely poor. Play without fear, we’ll trust the youngsters etc and then doing the opposite. At least ince was pretty honest he didn’t rate the kids, and I came to expect nothing better
As you say, was prob far less harmful overall but for me, more disappointing
Hopefully Selles will trust them more
Consider context too. Hunt had impossible circumstances - everybody down on confidence, players used to Ince anti football, massive do or die survival matches. Selles has had over a month to work with these guys and get his ideas across, and let them show what they can do in what was essentially a free hit.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:The drop down a level will probably do a lot of them the world of good to be fair. I suspect more will be suited to this level at the moment.Hound wrote:Obviously ince was v poor at the player management of the young players - but the message sent by Hunt was extremely poor. Play without fear, we’ll trust the youngsters etc and then doing the opposite. At least ince was pretty honest he didn’t rate the kids, and I came to expect nothing better
As you say, was prob far less harmful overall but for me, more disappointing
Hopefully Selles will trust them more
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 539 guests