It may make them realise it was the wrong money making decision as less fans (and ultimately customers of RFC) are served.Jaques Francais wrote:The decision to change the commentry was a commercial one, pure and simple. If you really think a petition will make any difference to a business decision, influenced by money, then by all means waste your time filling it in. But it won't.
Should push it upto 503 thenreading_fan wrote:500 signatures and I've sent information about the petition to all our Midland Royals members
504 actually!alad wrote:Should push it upto 503 thenreading_fan wrote:500 signatures and I've sent information about the petition to all our Midland Royals members
reading_fan wrote:504 actually!alad wrote:Should push it upto 503 thenreading_fan wrote:500 signatures and I've sent information about the petition to all our Midland Royals members
very true i think its important not to lose sight of the problem which is the club is going to lose exposure for what it seems a small amount of money in addition to alienating many current fans by not giving them freedom of choice and not providing ease of access to games when the fan is out of the catchment area.thefruits wrote:Royal Bother. I agree that name calling would be wholly undeserved and is not the motive of the petition or any emails that I have seen or sent.
This decision would be fine if it was a simple transfer of rights from one broadcaster to another with similar reach and breadth.
It is not. It will result in literally thousands of fans losing access to something which has brought them enjoyment in an accessible manner. R107 does not reach across the County and Reading is the only club in a very wide catchment area and serves (and is served by that community).
I don't think a club in London, Manchester, Birmingham or any other metropolitan area would take such a short-sighted view to cut itself off from its supporters in this manner.
oh and since the announcement, it is blatently obvious IT IS NOT WHAT THE CASH CARRYING FANS WANTellpryjon wrote:oh and proving the bbcrb's loyalty to be wasted
and?Chaney wrote:All you arse lickers are pathetic, radio berks are no great shakes!!!
You're so right, well done. A good arguement, I wish you'd told us this straight away so we didn't waste all our energy over this.Chaney wrote:All you arse lickers are pathetic, radio berks are no great shakes!!!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Orion1871 and 46 guests