Matt Mills has joined Leicester for 4 mil #chopsycnutwithattitude
Federici has issued a come and get me plea to Premier league teams #goodluckyoureshite
Matt Mills has joined Leicester for 4 mil #chopsycnutwithattitude
Federici has issued a come and get me plea to Premier league teams #goodluckyoureshite
Genius!!!!floyd__streete wrote:Seriously, I'll do the RFC twitter for free:
Matt Mills has joined Leicester for 4 mil #chopsycnutwithattitudeFederici has issued a come and get me plea to Premier league teams #goodluckyoureshite
What's wrong with that? Seems like some useful infoAndy Griffin is in the Media office now picking up photos of himself whilst humming a bit of Bruno Mars...
The resources are their for more investment in the squad
We're signing naff all #tightchairman
Agreed. While I have nothing against The Tilehurst End I thought it was pretty lame for RFC to facebook the "what is ambition" post as Long's transfer was imminent. It just comes across like someone is being paid purely to big up every club decision. They sure as hell won't use the majority fans opinion on selling the family silver, but they're happy to give a voice to the fans when they're saying the "right" thing.Red wrote:Their website is awful, although I appreciate their hand might be forced by the football league on this one, and their facebook material is all prettytoo.
Jesus fucking christ.Royals will be wearing the new red away strip for the first time tomorrow! Here's a shot of Manset's being printed > http://yfrog.com/h3th3gwj
Whereas in reality it happened the other way around and independent of the club. The article was written and published, and then RFC asked if they could link to it.RobRoyal wrote:Agreed. While I have nothing against The Tilehurst End I thought it was pretty lame for RFC to facebook the "what is ambition" post as Long's transfer was imminent. It just comes across like someone is being paid purely to big up every club decision. They sure as hell won't use the majority fans opinion on selling the family silver, but they're happy to give a voice to the fans when they're saying the "right" thing.Red wrote:Their website is awful, although I appreciate their hand might be forced by the football league on this one, and their facebook material is all prettytoo.
RobRoyal wrote:Agreed. While I have nothing against The Tilehurst End I thought it was pretty lame for RFC to facebook the "what is ambition" post as Long's transfer was imminent. It just comes across like someone is being paid purely to big up every club decision. They sure as hell won't use the majority fans opinion on selling the family silver, but they're happy to give a voice to the fans when they're saying the "right" thing.Red wrote:Their website is awful, although I appreciate their hand might be forced by the football league on this one, and their facebook material is all prettytoo.
Adamfederici85 Adam federici
Morning all ... So who is sticking there finger up at millsy ?
I appreciate that Svlad - nothing against the article which I thought was well done. It's just a bit irritating to me that the piece seemed to be featured by RFC in anticipation of unrest about the Long transfer, like they were saying "look, you might be pissed off but this fan understands how club's should be run - which I felt was somewhat using the piece out of context (almost implying that it might be a defence of player sales and no serious investment which - I think - would be a misuse of it).Svlad Cjelli wrote:Whereas in reality it happened the other way around and independent of the club. The article was written and published, and then RFC asked if they could link to it.RobRoyal wrote:Agreed. While I have nothing against The Tilehurst End I thought it was pretty lame for RFC to facebook the "what is ambition" post as Long's transfer was imminent. It just comes across like someone is being paid purely to big up every club decision. They sure as hell won't use the majority fans opinion on selling the family silver, but they're happy to give a voice to the fans when they're saying the "right" thing.Red wrote:Their website is awful, although I appreciate their hand might be forced by the football league on this one, and their facebook material is all prettytoo.
Hoop Blah wrote:Not sure anyone can expect the official twitter or FB to be anything other than 100% behind the club lone.
Obviously I don't expect the twitter feed or FB to be critical of the club, but there is a natural limit of credibility and I think they're skirting close to it. There's a difference between saying "We're sad to see Long go but it's a good move for him and the club" and saying "So we've sold our best player... but what is ambition anyway?"ZacNaloen wrote:Surely that's the purpose of the clubs official press?
Yep, my thoughts exactly.lowerwestjnr wrote:Adamfederici85 Adam federici
Morning all ... So who is sticking there finger up at millsy ?
a recent HNA? poll proved that it isnt the majority that believe the selling all the family silver financial conspiracy theorys. its a massive, but vocal minorityRobRoyal wrote:Agreed. While I have nothing against The Tilehurst End I thought it was pretty lame for RFC to facebook the "what is ambition" post as Long's transfer was imminent. It just comes across like someone is being paid purely to big up every club decision. They sure as hell won't use the majority fans opinion on selling the family silver, but they're happy to give a voice to the fans when they're saying the "right" thing.Red wrote:Their website is awful, although I appreciate their hand might be forced by the football league on this one, and their facebook material is all prettytoo.
M-U-R-T-Y wrote:By massive minority I'm guessing you mean tiny minority which in fact is not massive at all.
Argument invalid.
#semantics
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 109 guests