I'm fully aware of that - but once the board has gone up and the ref could play 4 mins instead of the 2 for various reasons. Only takes one idiot to overreact and you have a problem. Could you imagine the possible scenes should a club get relegated due to a goal scored after the allocated time has been played with the scoreboard clearly showing that.Legend wrote:Time added on is the minimum time.Stranded wrote:Same reason that they can't show replays of contentious issues - in case it inflames the crowd. Can you imagine what could happen if the board shows 2 mins and a winning goal is scored against the home side with the clock showing 93:24 for example.Legend wrote: Thank you
So what's the reasoning behind the clock not allowing to pass 45 / 90 minutes ?
Seems absolutley ridiculous to me.
The ref aint gonna blow up ten minutes after the allocated time is he, unless he wants a riot
from the north stand those of us with decent eyesight could not read the Prem Plus clockSilver Fox wrote:What would have happened if the "nightmare scenario" of an incident occuring after the minimum additional time had happened on Saturday, given that those of us with decent eyesight (or glasses) could read the time after the 90 on the PremPLus coverage shown on the scoreboard?
In the first half there was only 1 min of additional time, but Clattenburg let Villa take a corner with the clock on about 46:30. I mentioned it at the time and would not have been impressed had they scored.Silver Fox wrote:What would have happened if the "nightmare scenario" of an incident occuring after the minimum additional time had happened on Saturday, given that those of us with decent eyesight (or glasses) could read the time after the 90 on the PremPLus coverage shown on the scoreboard?
What made you change your mind?Spirit of Elm Park wrote:I hated maths.
As has been pointed out to me on numerous occassions before, the fourth official indicates the *minimum* amount of time to be added.el_presidente wrote:In the first half there was only 1 min of additional time, but Clattenburg let Villa take a corner with the clock on about 46:30. I mentioned it at the time and would not have been impressed had they scored.Silver Fox wrote:What would have happened if the "nightmare scenario" of an incident occuring after the minimum additional time had happened on Saturday, given that those of us with decent eyesight (or glasses) could read the time after the 90 on the PremPLus coverage shown on the scoreboard?
Exactly, something could happen in extra time. i.e a foul. The game still needs to carry on for the allotted time in this case.rabidbee wrote:As has been pointed out to me on numerous occassions before, the fourth official indicates the *minimum* amount of time to be added.el_presidente wrote:In the first half there was only 1 min of additional time, but Clattenburg let Villa take a corner with the clock on about 46:30. I mentioned it at the time and would not have been impressed had they scored.Silver Fox wrote:What would have happened if the "nightmare scenario" of an incident occuring after the minimum additional time had happened on Saturday, given that those of us with decent eyesight (or glasses) could read the time after the 90 on the PremPLus coverage shown on the scoreboard?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 45 guests