You haven't seen the goals that made up his hat-trick then.Row Z Royal wrote:He's not a big bully; he's a donkey. All I can say is LOL@ any team that concedes to him.
Don't need to.cmonurz wrote:You haven't seen the goals that made up his hat-trick then.Row Z Royal wrote:He's not a big bully; he's a donkey. All I can say is LOL@ any team that concedes to him.
Why? Because he's scored in 2 consecutive games?Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:Some goods lols this thread.
just ask Steven Taylorreadingbedding wrote:Don't think so, not in the same class atm, but he's a handful.
Big, hard, awkward target man.
Good in the air, don't know if in the class of Duncan Disorderly - but he'll be an absolute pain for defenders.
Well he clearly isn't a donkey, he's clearly a very good striker. You just need to watch him to see that. He was class last year and is IMO is showing his worth at the highest level.Big Foot wrote:Why? Because he's scored in 2 consecutive games?Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:Some goods lols this thread.
Looks to me like he's proving to be a real headache for defences. There was something fishy going on with the last England squads when he was left out.Hoop Blah wrote:He's the big bully of a number 9 we've been missing since Shearer retired, or at least he could be if he keeps up this progress/form.
Why would you have a problem with that?
Starting saving for the lettersRow Z Royal wrote:If Carroll plays for England then I'm going to buy an Argentina shirt and get "homo" printed on the back.Hoop Blah wrote:He's had a good start to the season, if he keeps it up he'll be making the step up to the full England squad soon.
Nick Shorey my Lord! wrote:Starting saving for the lettersRow Z Royal wrote:If Carroll plays for England then I'm going to buy an Argentina shirt and get "homo" printed on the back.Hoop Blah wrote:He's had a good start to the season, if he keeps it up he'll be making the step up to the full England squad soon.![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/footbal ... 166622.stm
It might just happen...
I take it back.frimmers3 wrote:"This could be a U-turn of Frimmers-esque proportions." frimmers does not do "u" turns". his followers however are incapable of discerning the intent-of his posts,rather than the supposition.
Row Z Royal wrote:I take it back.frimmers3 wrote:"This could be a U-turn of Frimmers-esque proportions." frimmers does not do "u" turns". his followers however are incapable of discerning the intent-of his posts,rather than the supposition.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 17 guests