Yep - was amazed at that.Tails wrote:Nice sporting behaviour to give the spanish the ball back when they had a corner....
Baines wrote:In the context of the match, picking on Spanish transgressions is somewhat like complaining about Mandela's activities in Apartheid South Africa.
Rubbish !CMRoyal wrote:Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.Sun Tzu wrote:Rubbish !CMRoyal wrote:Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
LOL at the idea that because they don't have lots of tall players they aren't actually very good !! Just LOL !!!!
I'd guess being European and World Champions means absolutley nothing. To have twice come through in major competitions is not worth even crediting them with being a pretty decent team ! They play good football, on the ground (why would they need a few 6' bruisers ?) and all 10 outfield players can play.
And LOL that they inly beat Holland by playing dirty !!
Just LOL generally really.....
Sun Tzu's quote button must be faulty. I cut and paste and got this:CMRoyal wrote:You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.Sun Tzu wrote:CMRoyal wrote:Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
Oh.Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
No I didn't.CMRoyal wrote:
You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.
I said that lack of height was a factor. If they were quicker the lack of height would not matter so much.Sun Tzu wrote:No I didn't.CMRoyal wrote:
You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.
You said lack of height meant they weren't a great team.
You said they couldn;t beat Holland using skill and did so by playing dirty.
'Misquoting' doesn't mean disagreeing with you....
CMRoyal wrote:Not that quote - the bits like:-
"because they don't have lots of tall players they aren't actually very good !!".
I never said that.
"I'd guess being European and World Champions means absolutley nothing. "
I never said that.
"And LOL that they inly beat Holland by playing dirty !!"
I never said that either.
I guess it's setting up straw men rather than misquoting.
I'm sure World and European Champions Spain really feel that being slow and short is limiting their standing in the game !!!!!CMRoyal wrote:
I said that lack of height was a factor. If they were quicker the lack of height would not matter so much.
Hobnob Rules of Engagement, old chap.I guess it's setting up straw men rather than misquoting.
I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. And when they do manage to do the latter, a bit of height would mix things up and add a major asset to their game. Not all great teams need height, but if they play very narrowly and don't have any real speed-merchants up front or running from midfield, they do need something extra. I don't think Spain have it, and would have been knocked out in most earlier World Cup competitions. So, it's the lack of pace AND the lack of height that makes them, ahem, fall short of being a truly great team.Sun Tzu wrote:If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
A great team would have won at least one of their games in this tournament by more than 1 goal that was scored in the latter stages of the game.CMRoyal wrote:I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. And when they do manage to do the latter, a bit of height would mix things up and add a major asset to their game. Not all great teams need height, but if they play very narrowly and don't have any real speed-merchants up front or running from midfield, they do need something extra. I don't think Spain have it, and would have been knocked out in most earlier World Cup competitions. So, it's the lack of pace AND the lack of height that makes them, ahem, fall short of being a truly great team.Sun Tzu wrote:If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
Been saying for a while now that cheating is encouraged because you get shit all if you don't go down. Likewise violent conduct is only ever properly punished if the player feigns injury. Be a man about getting an elbow for hand in the face and generally it's a yellow at most.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Leaving aside the despicable Dutch fouling........
Example 1 - Robben runs through on goal, Puyol attempts a rugby tackle and (for once in his life) Robben stays on his feet but loses the ball. Had he gone down Puyol would have been off for a 2nd yellow and Spain would have been playing a considerable time with 10 men
Example 2 - Iniesta runs through and goes down after the slightest pull back from Dutch defender, who goes for a 2nd yellow
For some reason this is the thing that is sticking with me this game, and its really annoying me.
We moan about people going down too easy, yet it is clear that you bloody well have to or you don't get the decision
You don't think the fact that they play a style of play which isn't English, and doesn't rely on running past fullbacks for a big bloke to nod in at the far post, might have something to do with that?CMRoyal wrote:I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. .Sun Tzu wrote:If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
Yeah, that's what I meant. It's absolutely the case that if you question the claims for Spain being a fantastic team then you must be by default advocating the English kick-and-hoof style.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:You don't think the fact that they play a style of play which isn't English, and doesn't rely on running past fullbacks for a big bloke to nod in at the far post, might have something to do with that?CMRoyal wrote:I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. .Sun Tzu wrote:If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
But yeah, that close-control, pass and move into space style they have really limits them.
This is grade A rubbish. It doesn't matter how many goals you win by, because you don't win by the volume of goals, you just need to score one more than your opponent; dem de rulez.bigmike wrote: A great team would have won at least one of their games in this tournament by more than 1 goal that was scored in the latter stages of the game.
The whole post is rubbish tbh. Spain weren't allowed to play throughout the tournament because of the reputation they gained from their attacking play in the Euros. All the teams barring Chile that they played against deployed defensive tactics in order to stifle them.Nick Shorey my Lord! wrote:This is grade A rubbish. It doesn't matter how many goals you win by, because you don't win by the volume of goals, you just need to score one more than your opponent; dem de rulez.bigmike wrote: A great team would have won at least one of their games in this tournament by more than 1 goal that was scored in the latter stages of the game.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 21 guests