Does it really destroy the pitch though? At least as much as you think it does.retro royal wrote:They pay £150,000 a year to destroy the pitch, costs £500,000 to relay the special plastic enhanced pitch, where's the value
Where on earth do those figures come from? They pay £600,000 per year AND share the costs for the pitch repair/relay every year.retro royal wrote:They pay £150,000 a year to destroy the pitch, costs £500,000 to relay the special plastic enhanced pitch, where's the value
This one's in my field. Reading is considered to be within the London catchment area for large gigs, and a stadium gig is more expensive and difficult to put on vs a night or two in the O2 unless you have Wembley/Twickenham levels of capacity.bobby1413 wrote:Oh and slightly off topic, but why doesn't the MadStad host music concerts? I remember the Chilli Peppers played after the 106 season. Other stadiums host big concerts, particularly in the summer break which doesn't effect the pitch as it's relayed or whatever.
In terms of revenue it would be great I think
Well Derby signed a £7m 10 year deal with Ipro, so no, we wont be lucky to match that. We can certainly match Derby's and/or better it.muirinho wrote:Where on earth do those figures come from? They pay £600,000 per year AND share the costs for the pitch repair/relay every year.retro royal wrote:They pay £150,000 a year to destroy the pitch, costs £500,000 to relay the special plastic enhanced pitch, where's the value
We'll be lucky if renaming the stadium brings in the same amount.
That was one of the biggest deals ever outside the Premier League. They are a bigger club than us. There is no reason to suppose we would be able to get the same amount. We'll see.One8Seven1* wrote:Well Derby signed a £7m 10 year deal with Ipro, so no, we wont be lucky to match that. We can certainly match Derby's and/or better it.muirinho wrote:Where on earth do those figures come from? They pay £600,000 per year AND share the costs for the pitch repair/relay every year.retro royal wrote:They pay £150,000 a year to destroy the pitch, costs £500,000 to relay the special plastic enhanced pitch, where's the value
We'll be lucky if renaming the stadium brings in the same amount.
Not in terms of league position, but in status, reputation (last decade has seen a sharp rise for RFC). How others look at us has changed dramatically. We are not viewed a small fish in a big pond any longer. We are one of the more attractive clubs in the second tier. Certaily on a par with the likes of Birmingham, Derby IMO.Maneki Neko wrote:top end
I think I see what you mean, we are definitely an established Championship clubOne8Seven1* wrote:Not in terms of league position, but in status, reputation (last decade has seen a sharp rise for RFC). How others look at us has changed dramatically. We are not viewed a small fish in a big pond any longer. We are one of the more attractive clubs in the second tier. Certaily on a par with the likes of Birmingham, Derby IMO.Maneki Neko wrote:top end
Because now we finally play the bulk of our football on the ground, rather than interfering with Heathrow flight paths, the condition of the pitch (which very clearly was/is worsened by the rugby played on it) becomes quite important. You do not want passes bobbling all over the place and the ball moving at different speeds over the deteriorated turf.bobby1413 wrote:Does it really destroy the pitch though? At least as much as you think it does.retro royal wrote:They pay £150,000 a year to destroy the pitch, costs £500,000 to relay the special plastic enhanced pitch, where's the value
If it does, then so what? I couldn't give a hoot about the state of the pitch - why is everyone* so obsessed by this?
.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Polonia and 52 guests