I'd imagine they'd look to a downgraded capacity ground but not sure how that would work out with current contracts?Sutekh wrote:Why's that then? Do you get a season off if you get relegated?
True dat... it's an utter disgraceCountryRoyal wrote:On a side note the pitch is truly shocking, I don't remember it this bad for some time.
sure, some people can appreciate a wide range of sports. I understand for some a simple game like football is as much as they can handle but there are more sophisticated optionsJohn Smith wrote:Are people genuinely talking about rugby on here?
Nameless wrote:and it wouldn't make that much difference to the pitch so we'd need another excuse for that....
[url]http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/rugby-news/london-irish-stay-madejski-stadium-4299077“Firstly, we won’t get relegated. But even if we did, we will still be at Madejski Stadium.
“You would expect when these sort of contracts are put in place long term all different eventualities are factored in.
“One of those is what league we are playing in, but there is no grey area. It is very clear, the contract works for us and we enjoy being at Madejski Stadium.
“We will be staying there regardless of what league we are playing in next year. That is covered in the contract so we are absolutely relaxed about that. It won’t happen.”
When did they play at The Stoop? That is Harlequins stadium (just across the road from Twickenham).JamieY26 wrote:It wouldn't surprise me if they have opted to not strengthen in order to go down and release themselves from the contract they have with the stadium and move to Brentford new ground when its finished.
There won't be a huge difference in the money the club receives as there is no real money in the game anyway.
They used to sell out the stoop when they played there, so I would imagine they would be willing to take a hit for a year in order to achieve their long term ambition of playing in London.
Lol at rugby being sophisticated. A load repressed homosexuals jumping on each other.Nameless wrote:sure, some people can appreciate a wide range of sports. I understand for some a simple game like football is as much as they can handle but there are more sophisticated optionsJohn Smith wrote:Are people genuinely talking about rugby on here?
But not a lot to do with the Irish playing on it. The problems go deeper than that.bobby1413 wrote:True dat... it's an utter disgraceCountryRoyal wrote:On a side note the pitch is truly shocking, I don't remember it this bad for some time.
Yeah it's not like we've had a rugby team on it every other season when the pitch was fine or anything.West Stand Man wrote:But not a lot to do with the Irish playing on it. The problems go deeper than that.bobby1413 wrote:True dat... it's an utter disgraceCountryRoyal wrote:On a side note the pitch is truly shocking, I don't remember it this bad for some time.
Not sure if you are on a wind up or totally dillusional!Nameless wrote:The pitch is designed to cope with the use it gets. And the areas of worst wear are pretty obviously caused by football use.
It's fair to say if the pitch was used less, and especially if there were fewer double header weekends it might help keep it better but I don't think there is much evidence that the rugby causes the pitch problems.
Irish shared The Stoop before moving into the Madejski.
As for rugby players being repressed homosexuals it's a thought that rugby is one of the few sports where openly gay players and officials have been involved at the very top level with barely an eyebrow raised. Repressed or just not bothered about it ? Whereas football is way too scared of it to do anything other than use it as a term of abuse. Very sophisticated......
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Clyde1998 and 67 guests