They drew 1-1 with Rangers. Celtic would have beat them.Tredder wrote:How did Cally do yesterday m8?
Fair enough - you weren't aiming that at Bolton alone. It does wind me up how the sports media treat the smaller Premier League teams - certainly it only seems to be a small section of the more upmarket papers which have noticed that Bolton in particular are actually playing quite well this year. The two worst games they've played this year were against Fulham and Liverpool - both of whom went to the Reebok to defend...FiNeRaIn wrote: Yep, I've seen bolton play a tonne, but what makes you think I am singling them out? Liverpool play crap boring football also. As it proved, a dire 1-0 win to Liverpool. Point proven.
How did Celtic get on in their last home game? One team is unbeaten this seasonTredder wrote:How did Cally do yesterday m8?
There was a clear advantage to be taken with Man Utd scuttling back and Spurs streaming forward. Gomes didn't take it.PieEater wrote:IMHO the ref got it badly wrong, Nani's deliberate handball went unpunished to give Spurs the advantage, there was none so play should get pulled back.
Are you an MP, i only asked one question?FiNeRaIn wrote:How did Celtic get on in their last home game? One team is unbeaten this seasonTredder wrote:How did Cally do yesterday m8?![]()
In other news Celtic have banned poppies being sold these year for remembrance sunday, pointing towards the fact that irish repuclicans find this offensive. There were over 200,000 Irish volunteers for for both world wars and poppies are sold in Ireland without any issue for most Irish. Why does this horrible little club in a certain part of glasgow feel the need to speak on behalf of irish people? Why do they feel the need to cater for a " minority" of their extremist support? i'll let you decide.
Bitter, vermin, reptile scum.
Erm, all SPL clubs will not be wearing poppies this year - see : http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/football/s ... -22625470/FiNeRaIn wrote:How did Celtic get on in their last home game? One team is unbeaten this seasonTredder wrote:How did Cally do yesterday m8?![]()
In other news Celtic have banned poppies being sold these year for remembrance sunday, pointing towards the fact that irish repuclicans find this offensive. There were over 200,000 Irish volunteers for for both world wars and poppies are sold in Ireland without any issue for most Irish. Why does this horrible little club in a certain part of glasgow feel the need to speak on behalf of irish people? Why do they feel the need to cater for a " minority" of their extremist support? i'll let you decide.
Bitter, vermin, reptile scum.
Bad post, i'm not talking about WEARING poppies, im talking about allowing the charity to sell and collect for them around the ground. Something Celtic ( being the only club) have refused.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Erm, all SPL clubs will not be wearing poppies this year - see : http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/football/s ... -22625470/FiNeRaIn wrote:How did Celtic get on in their last home game? One team is unbeaten this seasonTredder wrote:How did Cally do yesterday m8?![]()
In other news Celtic have banned poppies being sold these year for remembrance sunday, pointing towards the fact that irish repuclicans find this offensive. There were over 200,000 Irish volunteers for for both world wars and poppies are sold in Ireland without any issue for most Irish. Why does this horrible little club in a certain part of glasgow feel the need to speak on behalf of irish people? Why do they feel the need to cater for a " minority" of their extremist support? i'll let you decide.
Bitter, vermin, reptile scum.
And when some Celtic supporters walked out in protest at poppies on Celtic jerseys, those supporters were banned by the club.
In other news, the clocks didn't need to go back in some places, because it's still 1690 there.
But the ref (or lino) DIDN'T give the freekick, so they cant then suddenly disallow the goal cos Gomas fcuked upcmonurz wrote:Common sense should apply. Nani didn't just fall on the ball with his hand, he deliberately stopped it. Everyone knows it was a free-kick and the laws of the fame should be flexible enough that Clattenburg would not get carpeted for making a decision to disallow the goal. Embarassing.
You might be right but the laws of the game are NOT that flexible.cmonurz wrote:Common sense should apply. Nani didn't just fall on the ball with his hand, he deliberately stopped it. Everyone knows it was a free-kick and the laws of the fame should be flexible enough that Clattenburg would not get carpeted for making a decision to disallow the goal. Embarassing.
BR2 wrote:The same ref who didn't realise that Spurs had scored a legitimate goal when Carroll scooped it out from about a yard over.
Obviously a coincidence but.............................................................
Even then, im not sure how a Lino should be expected to sprint 50 yards in 2 secs whilst also looking to see if the ball had gone over the line.TBM wrote:BR2 wrote:The same ref who didn't realise that Spurs had scored a legitimate goal when Carroll scooped it out from about a yard over.
Obviously a coincidence but.............................................................Surely thats the lino's fault?
Whatever happened to Carroll?BR2 wrote:The same ref who didn't realise that Spurs had scored a legitimate goal when Carroll scooped it out from about a yard over.
Obviously a coincidence but.............................................................
Surely Clattenburg could have pulled it back for the original infringement having just allowed play to continue on the belief that Gomes would play to the whistle and kick from hands. Clearly there is no advantage if he has put the ball down to mistakenly take a freekick and then immediately conceeded a goal.Royal Rother wrote:You might be right but the laws of the game are NOT that flexible.cmonurz wrote:Common sense should apply. Nani didn't just fall on the ball with his hand, he deliberately stopped it. Everyone knows it was a free-kick and the laws of the fame should be flexible enough that Clattenburg would not get carpeted for making a decision to disallow the goal. Embarassing.
Can you IMAGINE the stick Clattenburg would have got if he HAD disallowed the goal?
In summary the pundits and journos would have said "He didn't blow the whistle, so didn't give a free kick - just because he didn't like the fact that Nani used his intelligence and scored a soft goal doesn't mean he can retrospectively decide that he wanted to give a free-kick. Everyone is taught from a young age to play to the whistle, that's what Nani did - the laws of the game are there for a reason and Clattenburg has made a mockery of them. He's not fit to be a PL referee."
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 24 guests