Predictable "thicker than a whale sandwich" post.Sharpy wrote:predictable mods post
Stamp your little feet a bit harder in future, that might just work.
Predictable "thicker than a whale sandwich" post.Sharpy wrote:predictable mods post
Completely irrelevant. I more-or-less agree with everything else you wrote, but until the problem of unfair treatment is sorted out you will have no support from me, or I suspect many others. If the club and stewards have still failed to understand this point, there is no hope EVER for a solution that all parties will find acceptable.Yellow Jackets wrote:However, the point people seem to miss here is that a large proportion of these away fans simply wont be coming back for the next game at the Madejski
Nail hit squarely on head.The Cube wrote:Completely irrelevant. I more-or-less agree with everything else you wrote, but until the problem of unfair treatment is sorted out you will have no support from me, or I suspect many others. If the club and stewards have still failed to understand this point, there is no hope EVER for a solution that all parties will find acceptable.Yellow Jackets wrote:However, the point people seem to miss here is that a large proportion of these away fans simply wont be coming back for the next game at the Madejski
They should lose rewards for being too thick to understand the rules and too obdurate to adhere to them. Act like toddlers and be punished like them.Winchester Royal wrote:What difference does it make to you if people in the back few rows are standing up?working class hero wrote:The writer was referring to away fans - but it must also be true for home fans so where is the problem????Seeing people slung out for standing is likely to discourage you from doing the same.
PErhaps thae answer is for stewards to record seat numbers and the club could then rescind access for the next 5 home games and also prevent culprits from buying away tickets? Even fine persistent offenders 100 loyalty points per offence...
Frankly I get miffed at the antics of some of our so-called hard core fans. They only think of their own fun - and sod everyone else. LEt the reasonable fans take the upper hand.
Fining Royalty points is ludicrous. Why should a fan lose the rewards they've earned from spending shitloads of money on the club, just for standing up and supporting thier team?
What 'antics' are you referring to?
Sounds ever so reasonable. But I bet that if the standing area was the East stand at the North end of the ground that the lads involved would whine incessantly...Fans could be prewarned that their area was to be made standing, and have plenty of notice to relocate if they didn't want to be in a standing area.
Given the club's extending the stadium, theres plenty of room.
Only if you are working with mental defectives. Most people can remain civil when confronted with a steward.Surely if you're a steward then you should expect abuse?
What are you going on about? Where did that come from???AthleticoSpizz wrote: too many are more bothered in watching the bullsh1t going on around them....than actually watching the game
Well, no. If bob wants to stand up and shout for his team then why is he having a person coming along and giving it the big one for?working class hero wrote:Only if you are working with mental defectives. Most people can remain civil when confronted with a steward.Surely if you're a steward then you should expect abuse?
I think he is referring to the numerous youths who spend half the game with their arms aloft, watching to see who is watching them posturing. If a steward could chuck them out he would be doing the real fan a great service!Skin wrote:What are you going on about? Where did that come from???AthleticoSpizz wrote: too many are more bothered in watching the bullsh1t going on around them....than actually watching the game
When I was banned for a few games I was told by the steward who banned me that because I was courteous I'd probably be back within a few games, and that he'd have no problem with me coming back in. If I'd been rude and obnoxious, I imagine I'd still be banned.working class hero wrote:Only if you are working with mental defectives. Most people can remain civil when confronted with a steward.Surely if you're a steward then you should expect abuse?
The idea that you aren't allowed professional cameras because they are dangerous is ridiculous. I'd have thought it was far more likely they are banned because of contractual conflicts with bbc and sky/ newspapers. Only their lot are allowed to take high quality photo's.Can you identify where they are, maybe you could take photos of those fans to back up your argument? In fact, scrap that, Cameras are dangerous, and if there was a fight you might hit somebody with it... I think that opinion is ridiculous. Do you not enjoy the banter between the fans? The traditional football atmosphere, its all a bit of fun... Why must you get so hung up on what other people are doing?
Exactly. Reasonable points the club wants to make about genuine safety issues are less credible if it uses the cloak of "safety" for things like protecting the rip-off catering franchise.zac naloen wrote:The idea that you aren't allowed professional cameras because they are dangerous is ridiculous. I'd have thought it was far more likely they are banned because of contractual conflicts with bbc and sky/ newspapers. Only their lot are allowed to take high quality photo's.Can you identify where they are, maybe you could take photos of those fans to back up your argument? In fact, scrap that, Cameras are dangerous, and if there was a fight you might hit somebody with it... I think that opinion is ridiculous. Do you not enjoy the banter between the fans? The traditional football atmosphere, its all a bit of fun... Why must you get so hung up on what other people are doing?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests