I really don't think the US are that bad. Sorry.RoyalChicagoFC wrote:Absurd
Just a general observ7ion --not intended toward anyone or any particular remark
Carry on
Spot on. We aren't great but we aren't bad either. I would say much like Reading, can beat the top teams on any given day but nowhere near competing on a consistent basis against the very top teams in the Champions League (yet).papereyes wrote:I really don't think the US are that bad. Sorry.RoyalChicagoFC wrote:Absurd
Just a general observ7ion --not intended toward anyone or any particular remark
Carry on
Fair result, and never mind that the referee and his linos smoke syphilitic jackass jerky --what's true today was true yesterday and shall remain true tomorrowseahawk10 wrote:Spot on. We aren't great but we aren't bad either. I would say much like Reading, can beat the top teams on any given day but nowhere near competing on a consistent basis against the very top teams in the Champions League (yet).papereyes wrote:I really don't think the US are that bad. Sorry.RoyalChicagoFC wrote:Absurd
Just a general observ7ion --not intended toward anyone or any particular remark
Carry on
leww_rfc wrote:2-2 me thinks.
Oh, piece a cake then!PEARCEY wrote:^ Smile Chi. You are well on the way to the last 16. Victory over Algeria gives you a great chance...especially if you beat them by 2 clear goals.
How does a 2-2 draw equal winning fairly ?Ideal wrote:The US won this fairly, they were cheated by the ref.Ark Royal wrote:Great game. Appalling refereeing. Disallowed US goal should have stood.
Did you right thisIdeal wrote:The US won this fairly, they were cheated by the ref.

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests