I broke the emotional attachment last season and haven't regretted it for a minute. You don't realise what a ball and chain your football club is until you break from the shackles. I now go when I want and can choose a seat pretty much anywhere I like. It's a perfect scenario.Dirk Gently wrote:
+1. The main reason for renewing is to keep "my seat" - which I've had for 10 years and personally chose in a portacabin on a building site in 1998.
But if the weird emotional attachment to this can be overcome, there would be little objective need for a ST.
And if, for some unaccountable reason, we did go up, it would be even less attractive to pay more to watch a sub-standard team get massacred week after week.
You are spot on. Even allowing for the worst effects of general inflation, season tickets and match by match admission are considerably more expensive than they used to be. And no, given the choice, I don't think it's worth paying the extra for the luxury of the Mad Stad.Royal Lady wrote:So have I, but relatively speaking the cost of the ST wasn't as great and I never expected us to achieve much. Things are different now, particularly when you have the Chairman telling us he wants us to get back into the Prem etc etc. Never had that with Frank Waller!
As well as outlawing standing at football matches, the Taylor Report from nearly 20 years ago insisted that the conversion to all-seater stadia should not result in a price hike. Lord Justice Taylor insisted that a "fair price" at that time for a Tier One match was £6. Adjusted for inflation this is now equivalent to between £11 and £13.RoyalBlue wrote:You are spot on. Even allowing for the worst effects of general inflation, season tickets and match by match admission are considerably more expensive than they used to be. And no, given the choice, I don't think it's worth paying the extra for the luxury of the Mad Stad.Royal Lady wrote:So have I, but relatively speaking the cost of the ST wasn't as great and I never expected us to achieve much. Things are different now, particularly when you have the Chairman telling us he wants us to get back into the Prem etc etc. Never had that with Frank Waller!
RoyalBlue wrote:You are spot on. Even allowing for the worst effects of general inflation, season tickets and match by match admission are considerably more expensive than they used to be. And no, given the choice, I don't think it's worth paying the extra for the luxury of the Mad Stad.Royal Lady wrote:So have I, but relatively speaking the cost of the ST wasn't as great and I never expected us to achieve much. Things are different now, particularly when you have the Chairman telling us he wants us to get back into the Prem etc etc. Never had that with Frank Waller!
There's a massive flaw in the argument. The quantum increase in income has come from TV income (especially the the top levels). There's no logical reason that virtually all of that increase should have gone to pay players' wages, but it has. Ditto with foreign investment.Sun Tzu wrote:RoyalBlue wrote:You are spot on. Even allowing for the worst effects of general inflation, season tickets and match by match admission are considerably more expensive than they used to be. And no, given the choice, I don't think it's worth paying the extra for the luxury of the Mad Stad.Royal Lady wrote:So have I, but relatively speaking the cost of the ST wasn't as great and I never expected us to achieve much. Things are different now, particularly when you have the Chairman telling us he wants us to get back into the Prem etc etc. Never had that with Frank Waller!
You miss the point though.
With the millions (billions ?) that have flooded into the game from TV it's inevitable that prices should rise because there is so much more money floating around the game. Add in the investment from mega rich foreign owners and it's hard to see why people can't accept that prices for the fans should rocket.
Um, is there a flaw in the argument there somewhere ?
It's almost criminal really isn't it ?Dirk Gently wrote:
There's a massive flaw in the argument. The quantum increase in income has come from TV income (especially the the top levels). There's no logical reason that virtually all of that increase should have gone to pay players' wages, but it has. Ditto with foreign investment.
Cheers for that. I've been standing in the same place or sitting in the same seat for 25 years. Now with two young kids, it has become harder and harder to attend every home game. I've missed 4 this season already....probably only missed 4 in 25 years. Coupled with the football on offer this season (and the general non-investment of new players); I have a big decision to make in the summer. I'll be gutted not to have a season ticket, but it just feels the right thing to do at the moment.Jerry St Clair wrote:I broke the emotional attachment last season and haven't regretted it for a minute. You don't realise what a ball and chain your football club is until you break from the shackles. I now go when I want and can choose a seat pretty much anywhere I like. It's a perfect scenario.
Sun Tzu wrote:RoyalBlue wrote:You are spot on. Even allowing for the worst effects of general inflation, season tickets and match by match admission are considerably more expensive than they used to be. And no, given the choice, I don't think it's worth paying the extra for the luxury of the Mad Stad.Royal Lady wrote:So have I, but relatively speaking the cost of the ST wasn't as great and I never expected us to achieve much. Things are different now, particularly when you have the Chairman telling us he wants us to get back into the Prem etc etc. Never had that with Frank Waller!
You miss the point though.
With the millions (billions ?) that have flooded into the game from TV it's inevitable that prices should rise because there is so much more money floating around the game. Add in the investment from mega rich foreign owners and it's hard to see why people can't accept that prices for the fans should rocket.
RoyalBlue wrote:
'hard to see'?
![]()
Absolutely the same situation with me, and exactly what I plan to do next season.ayjaydee wrote:[I also bought my ticket "off plan" but I think I am slowly coming to terms with the emotional attachment and will probably not renew next season. Nothing particularly to do with the current fare being served up as I have seen far worse in my time. More just a general disilusionment with football in general and having other priorities. Will still go to a good number of games though.
Have to confess that was always the way with me. From the Elm Park days, 'roll up and pay at the gate' has always been my way and I don't think I ever lost that desire to see the game from different parts of the ground. I only started STing when it became necessary, ie when we went up into the Prem, so I'm sorely tempted not to renew assuming that even if we go up it won't be such a novelty this time and I should have sufficient points to get tickets for all but the "gloryhunter" games. But I certainly won't miss having to put up with crowing Man U/Liverpool/Arsenal fans anyway.Jerry St Clair wrote:I broke the emotional attachment last season and haven't regretted it for a minute. You don't realise what a ball and chain your football club is until you break from the shackles. I now go when I want and can choose a seat pretty much anywhere I like. It's a perfect scenario.Dirk Gently wrote:
+1. The main reason for renewing is to keep "my seat" - which I've had for 10 years and personally chose in a portacabin on a building site in 1998.
But if the weird emotional attachment to this can be overcome, there would be little objective need for a ST.
And if, for some unaccountable reason, we did go up, it would be even less attractive to pay more to watch a sub-standard team get massacred week after week.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Apr 2009 14:48
05 Apr 2009 14:48I've had a season ticket since about '88. As easy as being able to pay on the day was, you weren't stuck with the same bit of terrace like you are with a seat, so there was no disadvantage.CMRoyal wrote:Have to confess that was always the way with me. From the Elm Park days, 'roll up and pay at the gate' has always been my way and I don't think I ever lost that desire to see the game from different parts of the ground. I only started STing when it became necessary, ie when we went up into the Prem, so I'm sorely tempted not to renew assuming that even if we go up it won't be such a novelty this time and I should have sufficient points to get tickets for all but the "gloryhunter" games. But I certainly won't miss having to put up with crowing Man U/Liverpool/Arsenal fans anyway.Jerry St Clair wrote:I broke the emotional attachment last season and haven't regretted it for a minute. You don't realise what a ball and chain your football club is until you break from the shackles. I now go when I want and can choose a seat pretty much anywhere I like. It's a perfect scenario.Dirk Gently wrote:
+1. The main reason for renewing is to keep "my seat" - which I've had for 10 years and personally chose in a portacabin on a building site in 1998.
But if the weird emotional attachment to this can be overcome, there would be little objective need for a ST.
And if, for some unaccountable reason, we did go up, it would be even less attractive to pay more to watch a sub-standard team get massacred week after week.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 42 guests