This particular thread will be full after the Scunny game.jonboy29red wrote:thought may as well start this now
You can, but you won't get in.Royal Lady wrote:Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
Well, today I just put my bag on left shoulder and walked past the steward who was stood to my right. Job done.Jerry St Clair wrote:You can, but you won't get in.Royal Lady wrote:Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
lol good for youRoyal Lady wrote:Well, today I just put my bag on left shoulder and walked past the steward who was stood to my right. Job done.Jerry St Clair wrote:You can, but you won't get in.Royal Lady wrote:Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
You rebelRoyal Lady wrote:Well, today I just put my bag on left shoulder and walked past the steward who was stood to my right. Job done.Jerry St Clair wrote:You can, but you won't get in.Royal Lady wrote:Am I allowed to refuse to let them look in my handbag whilst everyone else is allowed to just wander in through the turnstiles without anyone ever been searched?
They obviously know about youRoyal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
you could be carry rocks dont u know lolRoyal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
They're worried that 12" dildo with the girth of an elephants leg could be used as a weapon RL.Royal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
By the way, my wife would like that returned!handbags_harris wrote:They're worried that 12" dildo with the girth of an elephants leg could be used as a weapon RL.Royal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
Can't think of any 20 year olds who wore a baggy jacket to the game yesterday off the top of my headRoyal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.
I didn't mean anyone in particular you loon! It was just an example. Even you would agree that out of 2 people likely to be carrying an offensive weapon with intent to cause danger to others, the choice between me or a young bloke who has had a couple of beers prior to the game would indicate to the more sane amongst us that the young bloke is the more likely of the two. I wouldn't care if I was searched all the time, if I saw others being frisked, but they're not.Big Foot wrote:Can't think of any 20 year olds who wore a baggy jacket to the game yesterday off the top of my headRoyal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.Wonder if he was searched
I don't think it's comparable really, people with bags get searched regardless of it being a lady like you with your handbag full of fags and lippy to the occasions when I've had a tote bag containing my Reading flag.Royal Lady wrote:I didn't mean anyone in particular you loon! It was just an example. Even you would agree that out of 2 people likely to be carrying an offensive weapon with intent to cause danger to others, the choice between me or a young bloke who has had a couple of beers prior to the game would indicate to the more sane amongst us that the young bloke is the more likely of the two. I wouldn't care if I was searched all the time, if I saw others being frisked, but they're not.Big Foot wrote:Can't think of any 20 year olds who wore a baggy jacket to the game yesterday off the top of my headRoyal Lady wrote:I know. But it's discrimination. I've moaned about this before. Fair enough if you stop, say, every 20th person and frisk them or whatever, but why would an old woman who happens to carry a handbag pose any more of a threat viz a viz hooliganism than a 20 year old in a baggy jacket or whatever. That's my beef.Wonder if he was searched
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 43 guests