In what way are they similar to Reading FC??? I knew clicking on "Display this post" was a mistakeFiNeRaIn wrote:So in other words, they are similar to Reading FC except they actually invested sensibly when they were promoted and reaped the rewards?
Interesting.
It's not interesting whatsoeverSvlad Cjelli wrote:It's a very interesting parallel with Gretna
For every Gretna and Hoffenheim, there's a United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Pompey, Cardiff or Palace etc...Svlad Cjelli wrote:I posted it because BrendyWendy raised the query about German ownership models and Hoffenheim in particular.
I'd suggest it's relevant here because 95% of posts here at the moment seem to be discussing the relative merits of investment/throwing money at the club (depending on your viewpoint.)
Gretna and potentially Hoffenheim are relevant here because they are the extreme of what some are calling for - unlimited income given or lent - which leaves a club so vulnerable if the benefactor dies or loses interest.
We have a Reading fan chairman, but i believe he's set things up so we're financially sound, especially in comparison to TSG and Gretna. Not everyone can win the league, someone has to come mid-table, that's us for now, could be better, could be worse.Svlad Cjelli wrote:I posted it because BrendyWendy raised the query about German ownership models and Hoffenheim in particular.
I'd suggest it's relevant here because 95% of posts here at the moment seem to be discussing the relative merits of investment/throwing money at the club (depending on your viewpoint.)
Gretna and potentially Hoffenheim are relevant here because they are the extreme of what some are calling for - unlimited income given or lent - which leaves a club so vulnerable if the benefactor dies or loses interest.
At least he's stopped hiding behind a silly false name.Big Foot wrote:For every Gretna and Hoffenheim, there's a United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Pompey, Cardiff or Palace etc...Svlad Cjelli wrote:I posted it because BrendyWendy raised the query about German ownership models and Hoffenheim in particular.
I'd suggest it's relevant here because 95% of posts here at the moment seem to be discussing the relative merits of investment/throwing money at the club (depending on your viewpoint.)
Gretna and potentially Hoffenheim are relevant here because they are the extreme of what some are calling for - unlimited income given or lent - which leaves a club so vulnerable if the benefactor dies or loses interest.
Srsly, save your fingers and don't post anymore as it's much too sensible

Yes - some wrote a bit back in the thread about us have a Reading fan as a chairman.roadrunner wrote:When you look at their stadium you know who they are and when they were founded. When you look at ours you know who the chairman is.
Safe standing. Jealous.
I thought the most important thing was that they had safe standing areas?Svlad Cjelli wrote:As you may know, there are numerous rules in the Bundesliga which make it arguably the best league in the world. The most important of these is that every club must hold a licence to compete.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests