FORSTERS_RIGHT_FOOT wrote:No, it's just 3 now.
Liverpool, Man United and Arsenal.
soggy biscuit wrote:FORSTERS_RIGHT_FOOT wrote:No, it's just 3 now.
Spurs, Man United and Arsenal.
^Agreed.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Depends how you measure "big". On financial worth there's now a big 5 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal & Man City.
Spurs' finances > Liverpool's financesSvlad Cjelli wrote:Depends how you measure "big". On financial worth there's now a big 5 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal & Man City.
Depends what you mean by 'financial worth' Man Utd, Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal don't appear to have any money to spend so in terms of financial clout there's a 'big one'Svlad Cjelli wrote:Depends how you measure "big". On financial worth there's now a big 5 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal & Man City.
Svlad Cjelli wrote:before the PL came along
No Fixed Abode wrote:
I think you could call it a big 3 now reallyMr Angry wrote:"The Big Four" was always journalistic shorthand for meaning who would be the most likely to be in the top 4 positions as it appeared that 4 teams - recently, Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd and Arsenal - would always be there or thereabouts.
Problem is, as has been demonstrated, that that journalistic licence no longer applies, as 2 others (Spurs and Man City) are joining the party, and I remember Everton and Villa being referred to as "big four" clubs (before Abramovich's money, and George Graham's discipline made Chelsea and Arsenal so formidable).
As always in the wonderful world of the Premier league, it is all about the now.
Do what now?rfcjoe wrote:RL, af1(rip), rabidbee, JMW(apparently)
The Big Four.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests