Sharpy wrote:31 fkin quid
T.R.O.L.I. wrote:Sharpy wrote:31 fkin quid
It is allowed because they're using the membership scheme as a loophole round the FL pricing regulations.Mr. Reading wrote:Charging away fans more than home fasns... Is that legal?? I expect we'll be getting the best seats in the house for that price! Delia cooking the pre-match pies herself?
Don't you have a limited number of opt-outs each season?BenReadingFC wrote:Fking gr8, As an AST, I get bent over and raped like a filthy whore by a bunch of carrot crunching, tractor riding pcunts. pwankers.
This was my first thought when seeing this pricing. The push for promotion is a costly matter.BenReadingFC wrote:Fking gr8, As an AST, I get bent over and raped like a filthy whore by a bunch of carrot crunching, tractor riding pcunts. pwankers.
That's actually another point Dirk, they also have the banding wrong. A+ not ASvlad Cjelli wrote:
It is allowed because they're using the membership scheme as a loophole round the FL pricing regulations. .
I don't think the phrase "in the long term" is actually in the lexicon of many football clubs tbhRed wrote:100% season tickets would cut down on a lot of admin for the TO, that's for sure. Would also be guaranteed income.
But I think clubs are cautious of doing this as it's much harder for the next generation of fans to come through, so you'd be shooting yourself in the foot long term.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 74 guests