Agreed on the last point you so eloquently make, but can you link me to 'Liverpool crying foul' ?Franchise FC wrote:What goes around comes around.
Liverpool bid for player - bid rejected - player hands in transfer request - request denied - Liverpool continue chase for said player
Sound familiar
Now the shoe's on the other foot, LOLiverpooLOL are crying foul.
As for demanding loyalty - less than one percent of players have any loyalty to anything other than their pay packet
Kiss the badge - kiss my @rse more like
In general I agree with your sentiments (we're all bastards really) but one important difference is that Liverpool has said that Torres is not for sale while both Ajax and Blackpool have protested as to how insulted they are while indicating that the players concerned are for sale at the right price.Franchise FC wrote:What goes around comes around.
Liverpool bid for player - bid rejected - player hands in transfer request - request denied - Liverpool continue chase for said player
Sound familiar
Now the shoe's on the other foot, LOLiverpooLOL are crying foul.
As for demanding loyalty - less than one percent of players have any loyalty to anything other than their pay packet
Kiss the badge - kiss my @rse more like
According to the oracle that is Sky Sports News Liverpool are considering reporting Chelsea for an illegal approachcmonurz wrote:Agreed on the last point you so eloquently make, but can you link me to 'Liverpool crying foul' ?Franchise FC wrote:What goes around comes around.
Liverpool bid for player - bid rejected - player hands in transfer request - request denied - Liverpool continue chase for said player
Sound familiar
Now the shoe's on the other foot, LOLiverpooLOL are crying foul.
As for demanding loyalty - less than one percent of players have any loyalty to anything other than their pay packet
Kiss the badge - kiss my @rse more like
Snigger.Scylla wrote:Abramovic was trying to feel him up in South Africa.
I don't believe there's any sulking involved. It's all about getting the best price for Torres. The new lad is his replacement, not his strike partner. Liverpool believe Torres was approached illegally by Chelsea last summer, and if that is true then combined with Torres looking unsettled, distracted perhaps, and nothing like the player of past seasons, they knew and were preparing for his departure. Speculation of course.readingbedding wrote:Liverpool refuses request.
No point keeping a player there if he doesn't want to be there.
Sulk.
Bet that made all the differencecmonurz wrote:Rumour mill says that Chelsea will be successful on Monday with a bid of £45m + Sturridge.
cmonurz wrote:Rumour mill says that Chelsea will be successful on Monday with a bid of £45m + Sturridge.
I think that Sturridge would be well advised to keep out of this mess.Alan Partridge wrote:Bet that made all the differencecmonurz wrote:Rumour mill says that Chelsea will be successful on Monday with a bid of £45m + Sturridge.
I would take the money and run!cmonurz wrote:Rumour mill says that Chelsea will be successful on Monday with a bid of £45m + Sturridge.
He'd come in associated with the loss of Torres and with Roy - who tried to get him on loan a few weeks back - and seen as a bone thrown by Chelsea. He'd need to get off to a very quick start to overcome all that.roadrunner wrote:And with the new boy in I'd say that's not bad business. Liverpool's striking options a woeful, so Sturridge would be a good signing for where they currently find their selves. Also money to fund further signings for what is a mammoth rebuilding job ahead.
Lost me there.Royal With Cheese wrote:Snigger.Scylla wrote:Abramovic was trying to feel him up in South Africa.
Back to the subjet - the boy actually wants to win something and likes watching "Not going out" on Thursday evenings.
Users browsing this forum: Fluff, Google [Bot] and 22 guests