I prolly wouldn't mind the official twatter feed if they didn't use it for text commentarymuddyfeet wrote:Not even looked at this yet, is it worse that the crap they spout through twitter/ facebk?!
Or if there was ever anything on it that wasn't massively over-stating the positives - or if there was ever something negative on there to give the rest balance and credibility.Silver Fox wrote:I prolly wouldn't mind the official twatter feed if they didn't use it for text commentarymuddyfeet wrote:Not even looked at this yet, is it worse that the crap they spout through twitter/ facebk?!
Sounds a bit ghey that's all.Mike Hunt wrote:I am pretty sure the guy running it was the guy running the unofficial Reading one. And they hired him...
He now gets to go in the dressing rooms before games etc... not a bad gig if you ask me...
Have you ever listened to Peter Hood on Reading World/107? Fcuk me, he can make opening a packet of crisps sound like winning the lottery.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Or if there was ever anything on it that wasn't massively over-stating the positives - or if there was ever something negative on there to give the rest balance and credibility.Silver Fox wrote:I prolly wouldn't mind the official twatter feed if they didn't use it for text commentarymuddyfeet wrote:Not even looked at this yet, is it worse that the crap they spout through twitter/ facebk?!
Woah there big fellah, that's one hell of a statement.Compo's Hat wrote:Makes some of the posters on hna look like they know what they're talking about.
And the spelling too!Royal With Cheese wrote:Woah there big fellah, that's one hell of a statement.Compo's Hat wrote:Makes some of the posters on hna look like they know what they're talking about.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 70 guests