Why we he get Hammond involved?!Forest Gump wrote:Thank you for many years of fantastic support for our club.
However it is time to admit that the club is now firmly in decline and this is as much of your making as had been our rise up the league.
Frankly, you haven't learned enough about the footballing side and given that you are not prepared or perhaps able to match what some of the more ambitious competitors are doing you are holding this club back.
As a fan I have had enough of the false promises and positive spin; a total lack of support for the manager this season ( especially no loans in during an injury crisis!) tells the truth - you have no passion left for the club.
Please get consultants in to find a new buyer - do not get Nicky Hammond involved.
Good luck
Forest Gump wrote:Thank you for many years of fantastic support for our club.
However it is time to admit that the club is now firmly in decline and this is as much of your making as had been our rise up the league.
Frankly, you haven't learned enough about the footballing side and given that you are not prepared or perhaps able to match what some of the more ambitious competitors are doing you are holding this club back.
As a fan I have had enough of the false promises and positive spin; a total lack of support for the manager this season ( especially no loans in during an injury crisis!) tells the truth - you have no passion left for the club.
Please get consultants in to find a new buyer - do not get Nicky Hammond involved.
Good luck
I am jealous of the Dortmund/German model of ownership. Unless there is radical change, it will never happen here though. Such a shame.ZacNaloen wrote:Football Clubs should be a club, owned by it's members and it's day to day paid for out of it's income. Not rich Oligarchs from around the world with no prior connection to the club.
"Didn't draw up a watertight contract"?! What an understatement! It would appear to have been as watertight as a sieve! He clearly isn't (is no longer?) the business genius that his admirers make out. The equivalent of making a massive mortgage advance without a charge on the property so that the house can't be reclaimed and the borrower kicked out when he refuses to pay the mortgage!Royal Lady wrote:I refuse to blame Sir John. He was done over by that Russian idiot - yes, he may have been desperate for his money and maybe didn't draw up a water-tight contract - but he clearly doesn't have enough money of his own to plough into the club for new players etc. He's getting old now, he's done his bit for us and anyone who doesn't realise the fantastic contributions that he has made to this club over the years, needs a good kicking imo.
Sure, we could do with someone with lots of spare money kicking about - but, as many of us said when TSI were first mooted, be careful what you wish for. A Vincent Tan, a Karl Oyston, there's way more people out there like them than the Dave Whelan's and Sir John Madejski's of this world.
Fiver not payable. It would appear I am not the only one to spot that the emperor is now somewhat lacking in clothing. The club may or may not be progressing under wantaway Madejski but others are moving forward quicker so in relative terms we are drifting backwards.Readingfanman wrote:Royalblue with a new alias AICMFP.
It's not quite as good as people think, or Dortmund would not have been on the brink of going under with debts of €200 million a few years back.Dano wrote: I am jealous of the Dortmund/German model of ownership. Unless there is radical change, it will never happen here though. Such a shame.
+1Ian Royal wrote:Well said both HH & RL.
Won't FFP will deal with that?tmesis wrote:It's not quite as good as people think, or Dortmund would not have been on the brink of going under with debts of €200 million a few years back.Dano wrote: I am jealous of the Dortmund/German model of ownership. Unless there is radical change, it will never happen here though. Such a shame.
Clubs do still get themselves in the crap, even in Germany.
If there's one rule I would bring in, it would be to not allow to clubs to run up debt owed to the owner or one of his companies. If an owner wants to bankroll a club, he should have to do it as sponsorship, so the club can't just find themselves £50 million in debt if the owner gets bored.
Exactly this. Voted in by David Gill and the like to preserve their clubs dominance, these big clubs don't vote for something unless they can get it to work for them.Kitsondinho wrote:FFP will do bugger all. It'll be the usual fudge where smaller clubs get shafted and bigger ones escape. The FL, PL and FA have shown this time and again (West Ham, Luton, B.mouth etc). Same thing in Europe. PSG and Man City are likely to fall foul of the FFP regs......can you honestly see UEFA banning them from Europe??
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests