by Nameless » 17 Apr 2015 23:24
17 Apr 2015 23:24by Dick Habbin's hairdo » 19 Apr 2015 19:09
19 Apr 2015 19:09by 3points » 19 Apr 2015 22:07
19 Apr 2015 22:07Yep, had exactly the same thought about the t shirts, and a potential future sponsor. When does our Waitrose deal run out.Nameless wrote:Perhaps more to follow....
Maybe they paid for the t shirts ?
by Nameless » 19 Apr 2015 22:16
19 Apr 2015 22:16by UpThePrem » 20 Apr 2015 09:11
20 Apr 2015 09:11Correct. First female to be on the board of the company and has been since 2001.Nameless wrote:I think Sasima is on their board....

by ZacNaloen » 20 Apr 2015 20:17
20 Apr 2015 20:17by Stevie G » 20 Apr 2015 20:44
20 Apr 2015 20:44by Forbury Lion » 21 Apr 2015 14:16
21 Apr 2015 14:16I hope we're not Thai'd down to their sponsorship.Forbury Lion wrote:Personally, I hope we don't have a logo on the back of our shirts next season - It looks tacky/desperate.
by Forbury Lion » 22 Apr 2015 09:58
22 Apr 2015 09:58I'd pay extra to have the sponsorship logs removed, although I don't mind Waitrose using my stomach to advertise their services.Stuka wrote:LOL at anybody who pays to have the logo of a big company on the back of their shirt.
Forbury Lion wrote:I'd pay extra to have the sponsorship logs removed, although I don't mind Waitrose using my stomach to advertise their services.Stuka wrote:LOL at anybody who pays to have the logo of a big company on the back of their shirt.
Even if it helps us massage the figures? Could finish with a happy ending.genome wrote:I hope we're not Thai'd down to their sponsorship.Forbury Lion wrote:Personally, I hope we don't have a logo on the back of our shirts next season - It looks tacky/desperate.
by Big Foot » 22 Apr 2015 13:10
22 Apr 2015 13:10Sounds gr8, m8Stuka wrote: I do quite like the idea of the stadium becoming the Thai Stadium though. Could have ladyboys as cheerleaders, and pad noodles and jungle curry from the kiosks washed down with Chang (the beer, not the drug).
by loyalroyaldaz » 26 Apr 2015 10:05
26 Apr 2015 10:05the problem, to a large extent, was that it worked for so long that we couldn't really adjust when it started failing.loyalroyaldaz wrote: Mick Gooding said yesterday "The Reading way has had it's Day", we can only hope.......
by loyalroyaldaz » 26 Apr 2015 11:23
26 Apr 2015 11:23Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests