Don't they need a full sized pitch rather than just a stand? And wouldn't a stand be sloping? And have steps? .... I'll get my coat.Dave-Royal wrote:why can't there play at mad stand
Good to see you've recovered sufficiently from the SC fiasco to display some humour, Strap. I was worried for you!strap wrote:Don't they need a full sized pitch rather than just a stand? And wouldn't a stand be sloping? And have steps? .... I'll get my coat.Dave-Royal wrote:why can't there play at mad stand
Their crowds this season have been 40, 13, 5, 3, and 6.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Would've thought Scours Lane would be an ideal fortress?
Incidentally...RTFC's last official crowd v Didcot Reserves was recorded as...just..........
.........6
Strange statement from Farnborough.Dick Habbin's hairdo wrote:.... at Farnborough.
Can't see this posted anywhere else - The Team or General Football - but apparently RFC Women offered a "derisory" amount to extend the ground share at Farnborough.
http://www.farnboroughfc.co.uk/2015/clu ... fc-women/?
Nothing a groundsman couldn't sort out. Presumably they don't have a full time pro groundsman, just willing volunteers ?John Smith wrote:I presume none of you have played at Scours Lane? I played on it in September and the surface had more divots than a school pitch
ClassifiedsDick Habbin's hairdo wrote:Cheap women

id have gone with something less football pitchy, and more divoty, like the first tee of a golf courseJohn Smith wrote:I presume none of you have played at Scours Lane? I played on it in September and the surface had more divots than a school pitch
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests