I can see us holding prices rather than dropping them. You could make a case for dropping them to get more people to buy, but it's been clear in recent games that some STHs have been skipping games (loads of empty seats last week) so that argument doesn't entirely hold.Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:So Sunderland have announced cheapest ST for next season of 370 pounds.
Is it time that RFC were a bit more adventurous in the price of STs ?
Mostly thinking adult tickets.
Perhaps decrease in North, to say 300, or lower blocks cheaper, once again it is noticeable that the front seats are pretty empty when choice of the whole stand is same price.
So perhaps centre blocks in the east 300, up to the concourse entrance.
Surely you'd just renew in a row further forward to get the saving?Ian Royal wrote:I can't see price being a big enough issue in our attendances to be worth changing. It seems very unlikely it would attract a lot more fans, you'd have to be talking a hell of a discount to encourage enough people, and then you've got too big a gap to make up in income for it to be worth it.
I'd not be happy about someone paying 20% less than me to be closer to the pitch and have no / partial cover either. I'd be really oxf*rd off if I sat one row above the cut off point where there's zero discernible difference in seat too.
Dont worry I would not make the upper west st cheaper,Pandoras Box wrote:Personally, I'd rather keep them high, so that those who really want to come would be willing to carry on paying. In the upper west we must get most of the away dayers purely for the bigger games. For WBA I didn't recognise one person within the three rows around me. No one had any idea who the players were and sat and stared like being at the cinema plus loads of kids who couldn't sit still after 5 minutes. Simply so they can go back to work and tell every one they were there, but we'll probably never see them again. Cheaper STs will simply attract more of those types who will leave the seat empty for most of the season or lend it to more of their mates for a day out - they will not be RFC supporters.
Winchester Royal wrote:Surely you'd just renew in a row further forward to get the saving?Ian Royal wrote:I can't see price being a big enough issue in our attendances to be worth changing. It seems very unlikely it would attract a lot more fans, you'd have to be talking a hell of a discount to encourage enough people, and then you've got too big a gap to make up in income for it to be worth it.
I'd not be happy about someone paying 20% less than me to be closer to the pitch and have no / partial cover either. I'd be really oxf*rd off if I sat one row above the cut off point where there's zero discernible difference in seat too.
This ^^^^ + put the age up to Under 8's as my eldest wont get a free ST next season under the current scheme. All three of us have been to every single home game plus the cup games and even a few away games. So I think the plan to get more people going to games has worked. Yes there are probably a few empty seats during the midweek games that belong to an U7 but not as many as I thought there would bepaultheroyal wrote:Freeze prizes and keep the under 7s free which is an amazing deal and I would be very happy!
the cup game was a tenner, for a prem team, and we still couldn't sell out. just how cheap do they want em to go?!Ian Royal wrote:I can't see price being a big enough issue in our attendances to be worth changing. It seems very unlikely it would attract a lot more fans, you'd have to be talking a hell of a discount to encourage enough people, and then you've got too big a gap to make up in income for it to be worth it.
.
Hope they listen Crowthorne.CrowthorneRoyal wrote:This ^^^^ + put the age up to Under 8's as my eldest wont get a free ST next season under the current scheme. All three of us have been to every single home game plus the cup games and even a few away games. So I think the plan to get more people going to games has worked. Yes there are probably a few empty seats during the midweek games that belong to an U7 but not as many as I thought there would bepaultheroyal wrote:Freeze prizes and keep the under 7s free which is an amazing deal and I would be very happy!
a family season ticket works out as only 25 quid extra per kid, so its not the end of the worldCrowthorneRoyal wrote:This ^^^^ + put the age up to Under 8's as my eldest wont get a free ST next season under the current scheme. All three of us have been to every single home game plus the cup games and even a few away games. So I think the plan to get more people going to games has worked. Yes there are probably a few empty seats during the midweek games that belong to an U7 but not as many as I thought there would bepaultheroyal wrote:Freeze prizes and keep the under 7s free which is an amazing deal and I would be very happy!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests