Your reading is different to mine. Isn't this more to do with diluting other shareholders?winchester_royal wrote:Interesting (and probably quite promising) that they've chosen to pump funds in this way rather than a loan.
Well according to the filing they've paid 52.5p per share for over 30m shares, so that's a very expensive way to dilute another person's shareholding.Green wrote:Your reading is different to mine. Isn't this more to do with diluting other shareholders?winchester_royal wrote:Interesting (and probably quite promising) that they've chosen to pump funds in this way rather than a loan.
In short, they've filed their annual accounts.Royals and Racers wrote:I received notification that on the 8th December RFC made a " confirmation statement with updates"
anyone know what that means ?
it refers toOne87One wrote:Nigel Nowe now removed as a Director.
*cheers*



Been released on Companies House all on Twitter.........@AndrewWearing has gone through it as far as I can seeRoyals and Racers wrote:looks as if the football club accounts have just been filed with the city(year end 30th June 2017)
Any accountants out there able to decipher ??
Yes, looks like there was a huge increase in matchday revenue - I'm guessing that will drop quite a bit this year!Stranded wrote:Looks like the club made a profit last year?
Nothing to do with Gourlay as it predates his arrival.muirinho wrote:Yes, looks like there was a huge increase in matchday revenue - I'm guessing that will drop quite a bit this year!Stranded wrote:Looks like the club made a profit last year?
And a big increase in commercial revenue (sponsorship and the like). If this is Ron Gourlay's doing, then I can see why they brought him in.
doh! yes of course.Vision wrote:Nothing to do with Gourlay as it predates his arrival.muirinho wrote:Yes, looks like there was a huge increase in matchday revenue - I'm guessing that will drop quite a bit this year!Stranded wrote:Looks like the club made a profit last year?
And a big increase in commercial revenue (sponsorship and the like). If this is Ron Gourlay's doing, then I can see why they brought him in.
I'm assuming that 15.5 would also include agent fees? We paid loads of fees in Steve Clarke's time, - I hope they have that a bit mroe under controlHound wrote: Guessing the make up of that 15.5 went something like:
Dadi 2
Bacuna 2
Aluko 5
Mannone 2
Barrow 2.5
Edwards 1
Clement 1
Assuming Ilori is included in the accounts.
The 15.5m is transfers upto 30th June 2017 isn't it, so is money we spent on the likes of Moore, Ilori, Popa, Blackett, Harriott etcHound wrote:BE very interesting to see how much of the increase in turnover was due to the good season - must have made a fair bit from the televising of the 3 play off games, as well as the full house at the Madejski and Wembley
Looked like a much improved year on the surface of things.
Did notice in the notes at the end, the cost of recruitment (15.5m) in the summer wasn't included. Think next years accounts may well end up being pretty ugly
Guessing the make up of that 15.5 went something like:
Dadi 2
Bacuna 2
Aluko 5
Mannone 2
Barrow 2.5
Edwards 1
Clement 1
Assuming Ilori is included in the accounts.
It's the other way around - the 15.5mill is money spent since 1/7/2017. But, yes good point that it would include any staged payments for Ilori, Moore, Blackett etcStranded wrote:The 15.5m is transfers upto 30th June 2017 isn't it, so is money we spent on the likes of Moore, Ilori, Popa, Blackett, Harriott etcHound wrote:BE very interesting to see how much of the increase in turnover was due to the good season - must have made a fair bit from the televising of the 3 play off games, as well as the full house at the Madejski and Wembley
Looked like a much improved year on the surface of things.
Did notice in the notes at the end, the cost of recruitment (15.5m) in the summer wasn't included. Think next years accounts may well end up being pretty ugly
Guessing the make up of that 15.5 went something like:
Dadi 2
Bacuna 2
Aluko 5
Mannone 2
Barrow 2.5
Edwards 1
Clement 1
Assuming Ilori is included in the accounts.
Would also include staged payments on earlier transfers too, so could also include costs associated to transfers of Kermorgant, Bond, Rakkels or deals older than those.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 70 guests