If it could mean the end of FA Cup Semis being played there then it's goodOld Man Andrews wrote:It would appear that the FA could be selling Wembley Stadium to Fulham's owner:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43906272
Good idea? Bad idea? Don't care?
I think that's a given which means Chelsea won't be able play there due to the clash in the timetables whilst their new ground is built......someone suggested that they might use our ground on the radio as Brentford's new ground won't be ready and Fulham's is also going through a refit.From Despair To Where? wrote:I think it's more telling that Khan is owner of Jacksonville Jaguars and there's ongoing speculation about an NFL franchise moving to London.
Yes it is, but they won't be moving out - reduced capacity for a season whilst the Riverside Stand is redeveloped. It only holds just under 5,000 at the moment so isn't a big loss in terms of ticket sales.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Is “The Cottage” getting redeveloped?
Fulham will need somewhere to play (lol btw)
but will it be Fa cup final Only .Stranded wrote:Overall, I think this could be a good deal for all concerned.
FA no longer have to worry about paying back the debt on rebuilding Wembley or the costs of maintenance. Whatever is left of the 600m (or whatever the bid is) can be invested into grass roots. FA could heavily subsidise on even pay for coaching courses.
On the football side, will probably force England to play more games around the country but only in the autumn (assuming that an NFL team end up playing there), so would play games in Sep/Oct in Manchester, Coventry, Newcastle etc. Sure there would still be the option to play Germany or whoever at Wembley if really needed.
FA Cup Semi Finals can go back to being on neutral club grounds - Old Trafford, Emirates, Etihad, Anfield and St James Park all easily big enough to host those games.
If this bid is seen as the first step in either the Jaguars moving to London then this will really piss off Spurs, who have built out their stadium with the NFL in mind. So that'll be fun too.
Biggest opposition at the moment seems to be that Wembley could end up being called the Taco Bell Bowl or something stupid but isn't already sponsored by EE any way, so not sure how that causes a problem either.
Was the new Shite Hart Lane being lined up for a full time team? I thought they had a deal for 2 games a year, which I'm sure they'd stick with even after this. Not sure a football/NFL full ground share would work really.Stranded wrote:If this bid is seen as the first step in either the Jaguars moving to London then this will really piss off Spurs, who have built out their stadium with the NFL in mind. So that'll be fun too.
The Taco Bell Wembley Bowl, to be pedantic. Apparently part of the deal is that any new name has to include Wembley in it.Stranded wrote: Biggest opposition at the moment seems to be that Wembley could end up being called the Taco Bell Bowl or something stupid but isn't already sponsored by EE any way, so not sure how that causes a problem either.
If that meant they would actually build a big Taco Bell there then I am game for this.Sanguine wrote:The Taco Bell Wembley Bowl, to be pedantic. Apparently part of the deal is that any new name has to include Wembley in it.Stranded wrote: Biggest opposition at the moment seems to be that Wembley could end up being called the Taco Bell Bowl or something stupid but isn't already sponsored by EE any way, so not sure how that causes a problem either.
Think they had one eye on that - starting with the 2 games a year and being in a position to take on a full time team. For example, the changing rooms have been designed to accomodate an NFL team. Not sure how long the deal is for but can't imagine that the NFL would still bring one off games over to London as/when the Jags move over (which I can only assume is Khan's plan here).Silver Fox wrote:Was the new Shite Hart Lane being lined up for a full time team? I thought they had a deal for 2 games a year, which I'm sure they'd stick with even after this. Not sure a football/NFL full ground share would work really.Stranded wrote:If this bid is seen as the first step in either the Jaguars moving to London then this will really piss off Spurs, who have built out their stadium with the NFL in mind. So that'll be fun too.
'greed on the LOLz if it's upset Levy mind you
INOld Man Andrews wrote:If that meant they would actually build a big Taco Bell there then I am game for this.Sanguine wrote:The Taco Bell Wembley Bowl, to be pedantic. Apparently part of the deal is that any new name has to include Wembley in it.Stranded wrote: Biggest opposition at the moment seems to be that Wembley could end up being called the Taco Bell Bowl or something stupid but isn't already sponsored by EE any way, so not sure how that causes a problem either.
In a land where godawful shite fast food rules, Taco Bell is the most godawful shitest of them all. It's tortilla wrapped clagnuts.Pepe the Horseman wrote:INOld Man Andrews wrote:If that meant they would actually build a big Taco Bell there then I am game for this.Sanguine wrote:
The Taco Bell Wembley Bowl, to be pedantic. Apparently part of the deal is that any new name has to include Wembley in it.
But who doesn't like Clagnuts?From Despair To Where? wrote:In a land where godawful shite fast food rules, Taco Bell is the most godawful shitest of them all. It's tortilla wrapped clagnuts.Pepe the Horseman wrote:INOld Man Andrews wrote:
If that meant they would actually build a big Taco Bell there then I am game for this.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests